Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Maybe you can start a discussion about whether or not to add it at the infoboxes of Chinese dynasties at WikiProject China, I originally wanted to do it but am not allowed to, unfortunately there is no centralised place where I can discuss such a thing. --Donald Trung (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hello, personally I donât like either portrait. Yours is to dark and just doesnât look good as main image. And the previous is cropped and I personally donât like cropped images for info boxes. Perhaps we could compromise on a different portrait. Iâll check out commons and see if thereâs something better. Have a nice day! Orson12345 (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I think this would be the best portrait for the info box. Thereâs a lot of portraits of him when he was younger in the article. I think portrait of him right before his death in Morocco that shows how he looked older. Orson12345 (talk) 19:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Consuela9890, Please do not change the image on the Qianlong Emperor page, The current one is a more high quality one whilst yours is very dark and unclear. TheTurtleHistorian (talk) 07:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Portugal. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
On Wikipedia, we relay information our reliable secondary sources say, and generally use the terminology our English-language reliable sources use. We don't endeavor to correct "major fallacies" in our sources ourselves via material found on Wix sites. Your invented terminology will not be used, so please cut it outâedit warring from editors who refuse to do the bare minimum engagement with our policies is the most tedious kind. Remsenseâ„èźș17:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
If you revert me one more time without engaging with actual site policy or posting on talk about your disputed changes at all, you're going directly to WP:ANI, fair warning. Remsenseâ„èźș18:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusivelyas a sockpuppet of User:Oos88per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oos88. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators:Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Peninsular War, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Zai (đŹ âą đ âą âĄïž) 12:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Portugal. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Consuela9890 reported by User:Soetermans (Result: ). Thank you. soetermans. ââââââââ B A TALK 20:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello, Consuela9890, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Oos88 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 19:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
