User talk:Cnbrb/Archive/2021

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Orphaned non-free image File:20th Century Pictures logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20th Century Pictures logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fox Film logo 1929.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fox Film logo 1929.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Charlotte Catherine Anne Egerton (née Haynes), Countess of Bridgewater.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Charlotte Catherine Anne Egerton (née Haynes), Countess of Bridgewater.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

File:In the Bleak Midwinter (Harold Darke) - excerpt.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:In the Bleak Midwinter (Harold Darke) - excerpt.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:54, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Bob Enyart

On 20 September 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Bob Enyart, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Intentional links to DAB pages

I've seen a few of your edits removing the "(disambiguation)" from intentional links to DAB pages. While avoiding double redirects is usually a good idea, in the case of disambiguation pages the community has adopted the standard at WP:DABINT, including the "(disambiguation)" descriptor, even if the DAB page does not use it in its name. Hoof Hearted (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Oh, interesting. Thanks for the info - I wasn't aware of that rule, and to be honest can't even remember making those changes. Seems a bit of an arcane rule to me, but I'll try to remember it in future. Cnbrb (talk) 19:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dacorum Heritage Trust logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dacorum Heritage Trust logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Gorton Monastery

Thank you for your edits to the above. Much appreciated. I think it would be better to remove the main-text paragraph on E.T. Spashett, though, because its citation is itself sourced from Wikipedia. I have found from experience that you can put that sort of information in the form of a note (which I have already done in the article), but not in the main text, unless another third-party citation can be found.

If you are connected with the monastery, please could you kindly let me know whether the cloister gate still exists? I have a set of my own photographs of Gorton Monastery from the renovation period around or just before 2012, which includes the gate. It is a modern wrought-iron gate roughly 6ft x 3.5ft with wording included in it. The last time I saw the gate, in 2012, it was in the cloister, but not attached to its hinges. I was told that the gate would be preserved. I intend to upload the pictures in due course, but if you would like them uploaded urgently, I can do this for you. Storye book (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Storye book: - thanks for getting in touch. So refreshing to actually have a conversation on Wikipedia! Yes, I take the point on the citation for Spashett - I was hesitant about the reference, but I put it in anyway. I'll try to find a more reliable source for that. I should have more general bits to contribute in the next coupe of days.

I'm not connected with the monastery - just a passing interest. I don't remember the gate you describe. There is a gate onto Gorton Lane on the left edge of this photo.

I look forward to seeing any pre-renovation photos you can upload, but it's not urgent. Cnbrb (talk) 17:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I checked the Commons category again, and in fact I had uploaded a photo of the gate, here. If you zoom in on it, you can see that it says St Francis Priory Gorton. It was the only unadulterated or undamaged bit of Spashett's work remaining. The Gorton photos are on my to-do list, and I hope to upload them within a month. It shows the interior as very much a work in progress, plus some exterior pictures. The story of that job was interesting. Spashett was a Baptist who was or had been working as consultant for the Benedictines with Basil Hume as client before he became cardinal. The prior of Gorton would never speak to Spashett; whether that was a political stance or a religious one was never made clear by the prior. That was the same prior who knew Myra Hindley very well, although apparently she was afraid of his severe disapproval of her. But he nevertheless spoke to her as part of his congregation. Due to the prior's stance, Spashett had great difficulty in obtaining an architectural brief from him via other brothers of the monastery. We do not have published citations for this, but I have written it here in case you are interested, as it is part of the history of the monastery nevertheless. Storye book (talk) 20:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Fascinating story!! Thank you for telling me about it. What a rich tapestry in Gorton..... Cnbrb (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Just letting you know that I have just uploaded my 2006 photos of the restoration works at the monastery (here). Please accept my apologies for the poor quality of many of the photographs - I had not long had my first camera (late in life), and you can tell. The people I met there on that day were hard-working, dedicated, and had done a lot of research. They were broken-hearted at the damage previously wrought in the building. I don't know who made that hole in the wall, but i'm guessing it was the developer who had it before. I would love to know whether that carved monk's head is still there - the one in the very blurry picture. I hope you find something of interest in the 2006 set. Storye book (talk) 11:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you @Storye book: - these are really fascinating! Yes, some are better than others but it's a valuable contribution. Cnbrb (talk) 12:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blackadder philip of burgundy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blackadder philip of burgundy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)