Chancer Lastly

May 2026

Hello, I'm DiscoursesonLivvy. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Luke Harding, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. DiscoursesonLivvy (talk · contribs) 08:49, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Nick Bilton BLP

Hi Chancer Lastly. This was not a good edit: . This is why: . To clarify: "Propagandist" is a loaded term, a red flag for NPOV and BLP, and should only be used (if at all) with stellar references. But there are no sources cited in the article to support such a designation, and in fact the term isn't mentioned at all in the rest of the article (aka "article body" in Wikipedianese) – cf. WP:LEAD.

I was going to gently suggest you read WP:BLP but I see someone already did that , so I will instead forthrightly advise you to make sure you understand BLP and follow it, because you'll end up blocked for sure if you keep running afoul of it. Nothing on WP is taken more seriously; think of it as a "third rail". Oh, and Bilton apparently actually is a bestselling author. I'd seriously avoid edits like this in the future. Best regards and happy editing, Middle 8 ^{Neurodivergence} • _(s)talk 12:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Notification of ANI thread

As you seem determined to violate BLP despite warnings (just above), ANI thread is here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#h-Editor_w/_multiple_BLP_vios,_ignored_warnings,_edit-warring-20260604104400 -- Middle 8 ^{Neurodivergence} • _(s)talk 10:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Nellie Bowles. You were specifically warned not to add unsourced negative commentary to a BLP on 2 June, and you promptly did the same again. Further episodes of the same behaviour may lead to longer or indefinite blocks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Black Kite (talk) 11:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)