Chalamet0

July 2026

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Wedding of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please cite a reliable source when you add a prose, and go through Wikipedia's notability guidelines. ℛonherry☘ 19:04, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Why is it not constructive? I have added credible sources. Chalamet0 (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Moscriptcallum per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moscriptcallum. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  PhilKnight (talk) 02:09, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

how do i get unblocked? Chalamet0 (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

hi @philknight how do i get unblocked? Chalamet0 (talk) 14:50, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) You need to either submit a request through the unblock wizard or by placing {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} on your page, replacing Your reason here with your reasoning for being unblocked. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 14:53, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Chalamet0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

ebrolaurarosenberg1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Please list all accounts you have used besides this one. moscriptcallum Have you taken the standard offer? (six months with no edits) Yes. Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request? I was trying to make helpful edits in underserved wiki pages.

Chalamet0 (talk) 14:55, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You claim you've gone six months with zero edits. It's pretty easy to pull up your contribution log and see you've gone only 1 single day without making edits, and that likely because this account was blocked. I therefore don't understand why you expect us to believe any other claim you make. Yamla (talk) 18:41, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

i thought the question was asking if i was willing to go six months without edits? and i answered with yes, i am willing to go through those 6 months Chalamet0 (talk) 18:43, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Okay. See you in six months. Remember, you still need to contest your block and must make zero edits until then, including to this page. --Yamla (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2026 (UTC)