Celtoi

October 2023

Your recent editing history at Gaulish language shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Modern Gaulish

Modern Gaulish is my very first Wikipedia activity, so I don't understand the rules very well. But please also note that my changes were not the same or very similar. In the new version of my mini-article, I added more sources to the bibliography and also slightly changed the footnotes. But I understand that it was necessary to discuss this with the community. Now I have started a new topic in the "talk" section regarding the modern Gaulish language. Please help me if you have time. Thank you. Celtoi (talk) 00:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Theodora ENA Dream BBQ.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Theodora ENA Dream BBQ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ENA Dream BBQ Bathroom.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ENA Dream BBQ Bathroom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Hi Celtoi! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. I am assuming good faith, but this is part of an ongoing pattern that I've been seeing. I looked through your contributions, and have seen a couple edits where you added substantial content, but marked the edit as minor. Please make sure to not do this with those types of edits. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 16:53, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I often mark small edits as minor. I absolutely agree that I shouldn't mark such edits like that, in some cases it may be even my aoutmatic habit. Although, methinks, I cannot agree that such actions may be harmful or highly inappropriate, at worst it might cause slight confusion. But, I will try to mark less edits like that, considering that I edit on Wikipedia only when its necessary. From Alba, Celtoi (talk) 16:34, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

File:CRITICAL REFLEX.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CRITICAL REFLEX.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 22:27, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wplace has been accepted

Wplace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 21:16, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wplace image.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wplace image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wplace moscow.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wplace moscow.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 17:43, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

File:Wplace moscow.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wplace moscow.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 06:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Silksong plot summary

Hey, could I ask why you reverted my plot summary changes to the Silksong article? I'm just cleaning up the wording and adding some brief explanation where necessary, as some things were unexplained and unclear. KinoranaUPSB 15:20, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Well, uh.. Who exactly are you? You have your IP as a nickname. I guess maybe you're KinoranaUPSB? From Alba, Celtoi, (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Oops, I wasn't signed in on my phone. Yeah, this is KinoranaUPSB. KinoranaUPSB 16:56, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Your edits mostly were just a rephrase for rephrase, which was pretty pointless. Considering that the plot section is now literraly bursting with different views and ideas, each editor tries to add soemthing exclusievely from this, while other editors are trying to do otherwise and promote other ideas. I'm trying to structure this chaotic order and trying to avoid changes for chages, rephrases and expanding the plot section, because a lot of people said that it is too detailed. From Alba, Celtoi, (talk) 08:27, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation! I am pretty new to Wikipedia, so this is helpful. My rephrases were not just for rephrasing's sake, some things like "where she faces her past, slowly gaining information about herself while traveling and fulfilling many minor quests, known as wishes" just felt a little clunky and could use some rewording for clarity's sake. But I see what you mean, thank you for explaining. Once things settle down and a consensus is reached on detail, I may take a look again. KinoranaUPSB (talk) 21:56, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wplace Tokyo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wplace Tokyo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 21:49, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Please don't try to delete this image at the same second when it was deleted from the page. I suggest you not to do that until consensus on certain topic is reached. From Alba, Celtoi, (talk) 06:58, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve Fantasy Map Simulator

Hello, Celtoi,

Thank you for creating Fantasy Map Simulator.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hey, this doesn't quite seem to have the level of review coverage we'd ideally expect - I found a PCGamesN source but even then may be helpful to find any reviews covered in WP:VG/S.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vrxces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aggro Crab

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aggro Crab requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aggro Crab. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:31, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Aggro Crab for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aggro Crab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aggro Crab (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Henry Stickmin Collection

Hello, Celtoi,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SnowyRiver28 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, The Henry Stickmin Collection, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SnowyRiver28}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SnowyRiver28 (talk) 11:14, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of The Henry Stickmin Collection for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Henry Stickmin Collection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Henry Stickmin Collection (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:04, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Henry Stickmin Collection

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Henry Stickmin Collection requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — ERcheck (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Show of Appreciation

I wanted to show my appreciation for the lines at the bottom of your userpage, they really struck a chord with me. Trust me, one of my favorite things is combing through some of the Internet's endless rabbit-holes and finding interesting things, the obscurer the better. I found you through a category, just as you prophecized, specifically Category:User nv, which I'm a part of, and you seem like a very interesting person, an Ashkenazi-Greek-Scot-Pict polyglot Touhou fan, I can assure you through the power of probability there is likely no one else on the planet that shares all of those traits. And what particularly amazed me is scrolling down and seeing that multiple of the articles you contributed to or flat-out created were purple links that I remember visiting and reading through. Crazy stuff, hope you're doing well. Mils 87 (talk) 02:23, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Thrive (video game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thrive (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrive (video game) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:29, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angus (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brythonic language. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Evolutions game.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evolutions game.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thrive cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thrive cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thrive gameplay microbe.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thrive gameplay microbe.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Sequel of Spore for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sequel of Spore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sequel of Spore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:43, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Celtoi. Thank you for your work on Become (video game). Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A bit more reception would be good. Also note that DayOne is not reliable.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 18:34, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Newton Stone

Sorry about that but the source was fringe. i wondered about it when I saw no publisher so checkedb it.Doug Weller talk 17:41, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

I cited the article of Donal Buchanan, who is a credited historian, so I don't understand why you have any problems with the source? His view isn't much different from Kilpatrick and others. From Alba, Celtoi, (talk) 05:07, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Minor point, we only use published article and those must be reliable sources. That wasn't published. Major point. Antiquity (journal) has something mentioning him. If after reading that you still think it can be used as a source, despite being self-published and fringe, please justify that at WP:RSN. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 09:28, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Bird Game 3 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bird Game 3, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bird Game 3 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Celtiberian language

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Celtiberian language, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:08, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don't Starve, a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D game was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Olden Era.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Olden Era.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Crusader Kings 3 Map.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Crusader Kings 3 Map.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Penn65 contribs 00:16, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Your recent editing history at Scottish Gaelic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 19:27, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Original research

On reviewing your recent edits, I'd urge you to put your undoubted enthusiasm for historic languages to use and cite sources when adding or changing content of articles. You also need to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It does not publish original research, no matter how accurate you may think it is. Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 20:37, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it, just to remember. I might understand what you don't like about Pictish, but Cumbric article literally concludes that it got extinct in 13th century. Please see articles sometimes instead of fully reverting edits. From Alba, Celtoi, (talk) 07:49, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Adding unverifiable information and original research that may be incorrect is not improving Wikipedia. If anything, it damages its reputation. If you want to change what an article says please don't just tag additional information onto cited sources that don't say it. It's fine to note when the opinion of cited experts differ or is uncertain. But comparing what different articles and sources say, to reach conclusions not stated in either, is original synthesis and not permitted. In all cases, cite what you are adding from reliable sources and there isn't an issue. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 08:31, 20 May 2026 (UTC)