CLNoonan

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katherine Lambert (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

You have some issues here:

- The "One Grant Avenue" section is written really promotionally (and there's some promotional language sprinkled throughout the draft. - A few sections are missing citations, like "Quokka Sports".

- Remove all the external links throughout the body of the text, external links should only go in the "External Links" section

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katherine Lambert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the review and feedback. I will make the changes you have directed today and resubmit for review. CLNoonan (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, CLNoonan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katherine Lambert (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There's too much windy verbiage that might belong to corporate image publicity but really has no place in an encyclopedia (except perhaps within quotations from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject): "addressing melding and prioritizing progressive design principles", "aimed to revolutionize sports media by delivering interactive experiences", "groundbreaking adaptive reuse project", "acclaimed early 20th century architect Willis Polk", "state-of-the-art prototyping laboratories", "advanced interactive teleconferencing". We're told that one project in which she participated was "featured in Architectural Record, Metropolis, and Progressive Architecture"; and that another "was widely covered in the press, including The New York Times, Architectural Digest, Metropolis, The Architect's Newspaper, Artsy, and Archinect". Did each of these comment on Lambert's input (or on Lambert herself)? If so, and if it seems reliable (and so for example doesn't read like an uncritically recycled PR puff), then feel free to summarize the relevant bits, of course attributing these. Just listing sources that might or might not discuss her is worthless for this article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katherine Lambert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 07:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. I have made changes you've suggested.

This article refers to over 40 number of independent, reliable, published sources, that pertain to Kathrine Lambert and her work.  These cited sources include The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Architecture, Architectural Digest, Progressive Architecture,  Architectural Record, Archinect, The Architects Newspaper, Architizer, Artsy, Metropolis, Dwell, i-D, The San Francisco Gate, The Los Angeles Times, and The Napa Valley Register.

There are only 4 citations to materials produced by the subject being discussed, as these are multi-media works comprised of websites (and other media) that have an online presence for encyclopedia entry readers’ further knowledge.

There are only four external links listed are the official websites of the subject being discussed and her works.

Windy verbiage has been quoted from reliable and independent sources. Citations have been made.

Each the referenced publications comment on Lambert’s input, her work or herself.  None of them are uncritically recycled PR puff. All of the sources discuss Lambert and/or her work.  Summaries have been provided and attributed via citations.   CLNoonan (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katherine Lambert (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Coqui002 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

• meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
• or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
  

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Overly promotional. Trim and focus on how she meets WP:PROF or WP:SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katherine Lambert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Coqui002 (talk) 22:02, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I will be resubmitting and hope the following explanation is helpful to show how the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article:

Wikipedia cites the following qualifications for a Wikipedia article as it relates to notability guidelines for creative professionals.  Please see inline references showing the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article.

Creative professionals

This guideline applies to authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals. Such a person is notable if:

1.    The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors; or

2.    The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique; or

3.    The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series); or

Lambert’s work is the primary subject of the books Architecture X Architecture: A Dialectic and FACE: Tenderloin Aids Resource Centre.

Lambert’s work is the primary subject of the film No Place Like Utopia.

4.    The person's work (or works) has:

(a) become a significant monument

Lambert’s Telesis House 2.0 has been recognized as having Cultural Historical Significance.

(b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition,

Lambert’s work has been exhibited at the 2023 Venice Biennale, the 2016 Venice Biennale, and the Center for Architecture NYC.

(c) won significant critical attention, or

     Lambert and her work have won significant critical attention, including the Architizer A+ Awards, a Graham Foundation Grant, the IDECF Leibrock Fellowship for Universal Design, and a Napa County Landmarks Board Award of Merit.

(d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

Lambert's work is included in the permanent collections of the Smithsonian Institution (Washington DC), the Getty Library (Los Angeles), and the Dia Art Foundation(New York).

In addition, the draft cites multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject which cover the subject in some depth.  These include: "People Finder - California College of the Arts - Portal - CCA Portal" and "Lambert, Katherine C. – BWAF Dynamic National Archive". CLNoonan (talk) 17:06, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

_{Courtesy ping @Coqui002} qcne (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katherine Lambert has been accepted

Katherine Lambert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Christiane Robbins

Hello, CLNoonan. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Christiane Robbins".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:25, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve Christiane Robbins

Hello, CLNoonan,

Thank you for creating Christiane Robbins.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Notability is very thin here with little WP:SIGCOV on her in any quality independent source. There is also a lot of promotional content here.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 17:46, 8 September 2025 (UTC)