CJK Unified Ideographs Extension H moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, CJK Unified Ideographs Extension H, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: CJK Unified Ideographs Extension H (September 9)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Artem.G was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I don't think it's notable enough for an article (definitely not with current sourcing), but it can be merged into a Unicode article
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Artem.G (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Blahhmosh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Artem.G (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: CJK Unified Ideographs Extension H (September 9)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
Completely lacking secondary sources. Consider redirecting to CJK Unified Ideographs?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 22:00, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Xurome created on your behalf

edit

Hi; a mistake an one of my edit filters resulted in a lot of false positive edit filtering blocks. I've created the draft you were trying to create before on your behalf. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022

edit

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of ethnic slurs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:48, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Aren't the sources on the Wikipedia page not enough sources? Blahhmosh (talk) 01:48, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Like, "Vatnik", right? There's a Vatnik page on Wikipedia. Aren't the sources on that page not enough? Blahhmosh (talk) 01:49, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't get it, vatnik is a slur used by many people towards Russians, and there is proof of that being the case on Wikipedia via the Vatnik (slang) page. Aren't the sources on that very page good enough? Blahhmosh (talk) 02:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monte Carlo tree search, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Go. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Parti (service) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Parti (service). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Frost 15:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Parti (service) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Parti (service). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and needs more context. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma talk 15:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Blahhmosh. Thank you for your work on Cindy Crawford (disambiguation). Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congrats and thank you for creating this disambiguation page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 08:25, 8 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cindy Crawford (disambiguation)

edit
Notice

The article Cindy Crawford (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:2DABS with clear primary topic, per pageviews.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.LaundryPizza03 (d) 00:04, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Cindy Crawford (disambiguation) for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cindy Crawford (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Crawford (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 00:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Huatu

edit
Notice

The article Huatu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Huatu" is not mentioned on either page.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm JalenBarks. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Snuffy—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. Jalen Barks (Woof) 18:23, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Parti (service)

edit

Information icon Hello, Blahhmosh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parti (service), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply