Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
Hi BindiS! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:58, Tuesday, October 18, 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024

edit
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

March 2026

edit

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Haxhi Zeka University when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 13:51, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Query

edit

Hi, BindiS.

First off, apologies for the fact we're meeting in a somewhat chaotic set of circumstances! I'm one of the editors who has been volunteering to try and clean up the copyright issues left from the Wikiproject Australia editathon (whilst quietly cursing the existence URAA under my breath -- oh, why did we have to agree to it?)

Slightly more seriously, I note that User:Bahudhara has been pinging you in relation to this, and states that he created the page User:Bahudhara/Draft:2026 CCI mass content deletion - cleanup after consulting with you, in your role as Executive Officer of Wikimedia Australia.

Given you were apparently consulted about the creation of this page and, presumably, the language, and it's been so openly connected to the Wikimedia Australia chapter, I just wanted to touch base with you and express a few concerns about the way that page is being used to demean or insult editors.

Firstly, I find singling out a new, somewhat experienced editor, by name (and linking to their userpage), instead of going to that editor's talkpage, guiding them through the process, and offering assistance, to be somewhat bitey. Especially with the page opening with such strong implications of Wikimedia Australia involvement, I worry it can create a bit of a chilling effect - I'd have hated to have my newbie mistakes dragged up in front of affiliate, without members of the affiliate even reaching out to me! I actually find it quite disturbing, that neither you nor Bahudhara, seem to have seen fit to actually communicate with the editor in question., so disturbing, in fact, that I find it impossible to believe that this wasn't an oversight?

Secondly -- I feel as though I have to be the one accidentally leaving in half sentences, half the time! I do this to try and WP:PRESERVE content written by other editors, and then trim it out later, so it doesn't get eaten by the revdel. I certainly don't claim to be perfect at this, however -- but, again, I can't find any evidence that anybody has brought it up with either myself of the editors in question? Nobody is perfect, and it seems almost cruel to announce you'll be bringing up typographical errors or simple mistakes from editors, especially newer ones, as evidence of the the revision deletion process being, and I quote, a mess, again, without touching base with the editors in question, to let them know that they're making a mistake. I know that's not something everybody values on the internet, but I do my best, when mistakes are made in good faith, to talk with the editors, letting know how they can improve, or, at the very least, let them know they're being talked about. I'd have hoped that a Wikimedia chapter would extend the same courtesy to our volunteers.

Thirdly, on the Australian Wikipedians' noticeboard, I note the language is getting a little heated: references to "madness", among other things, feel a bit demeaning. Revision deletion is something that's hard to learn, but implying that editors who request it in good faith, even when their request ends up being erroneous, are somehow behaving as though they were mentally ill? Even though mental illness is nothing to be ashamed of, casual comments like this, meant as insults, can alienate members of our community who struggle with those issues. I can't blame you for sitting out the conversation, but you and Wikimedia Australia were mentioned in that conversation, and, with the private communication, it does give the appearance that you, or Wikimedia Australia, approves of such language -- or, at the least, will not speak against it. I know Wikimedia Australia values contributors, even those with mental illness or disabilities, however, as it reflected on the website: Wikimedia Australia is dedicated to providing a welcoming experience for everyone, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, disability, appearance, race, religion, or preferred free license (and not limited to those aspects). We do not tolerate harassment of event participants. and Wikimedia Australia is committed to growing safe, supportive and inclusive spaces (offline and online) and through its communications and other policies

Finally, the page also has some factual issues. Take, for instance:

A notification was placed on the Australian Wikipedians' notice board on 13 March 2026, at the end of the deletion process.

I actually notified Wikiproject Australia at the end of November, around the time that cleanup started, on the advice of Doug Butler. The notification I gave more recently was really only about one specific article, marked as high importance -- and, rather unfortunately, we aren't "at the end of the deletion process". There's still about 500 articles to check, I believe. And less every day!

Given that you'll be bringing this up to Wikimedia Australia, apparently, I do hope you'll keep this comment in mind. Hopefully whatever you bring up at Wikicon will lack such language, especially if it names single editors or gives the impression that you are making a call for action against them.

Many thanks, and I hope you're having a wonderful Monday in Australia! I live in Alaska, so I know your weather is almost certainly better than ours.

GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 08:06, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi GreenLipstickLesbian,
Thank you for raising these concerns, I appreciate it. Apologies for the delayed response as our small WMAU team is currently completely focused on preparations for WikiCon Canberra in 2 weeks, so apologies for not getting across this faster.
To clarify, while I had discussed with Bahudara the need for a project to address the CCI mass deletion, I did not review the page or endorse the specific language used. I agree that some of the tone (both on that page and in related discussions) should be moderated, and I’ll follow this up directly.
As you would know WMAU is not involved in editorial decision-making on Wikipedia, but we do strongly value and promote respectful and constructive engagement between editors. I agree that direct, supportive communication, particularly with newer contributors, is very important and I’ll reinforce that approach.
In relation to notification, while there may have been some earlier communication, from our perspective and that of several editors, the scale and urgency of the issue were not clearly understood until much more recently. Obviously I can't speak for all Australian Wikimedians but potentially the timing of the November notice went 'under the radar' (end of year busy period, start of Summer holidays, etc) and now editors are trying to catch up. This has made what is already a complex cleanup significantly more difficult, particularly in the absence of a clear, consolidated list of affected articles to work from.
Thank you also for sharing your perspective and additional context as it’s helpful in understanding how this has unfolded.
I appreciate the work you’re doing on what is clearly a complex cleanup effort.
Thanks BindiS (talk) 02:59, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red – April 2026

edit
Women in Red | April 2026, Vol 12, Issue 4, Nos 358, 359, 367, 368, 369


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, take a moment to ensure any notable woman is redlinked.
    Someone might be inspired to create an article for her.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:13, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

A BIG thank you for participating in WikiCon 2026 Canberra!

edit

Aliceinthealice (talk) 23:47, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

April 2026

edit

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Ossona when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red – May 2026

edit
Women in Red | May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Struggling to find scientific works to write about? Start with review articles or textbooks,
    which may highlight influential studies, theories or methods by women.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk 04:44, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red - June 2026

edit
Women in Red | June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375


Online events:

Announcements, tips, participation...

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Consider contributing to two of our monthly events at once, and improve coverage
    of LGBTQ+ women by de-orphaning their articles.

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Books & Bytes – Issue 74

edit
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 74, March–April 2026
  • New partnership: Swissdox
  • User survey results
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 10:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User:BindiS and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 10

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:31, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply