Archupnet

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ibrahim Nawaf Jawharji (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ibrahim Nawaf Jawharji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Archupnet! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Archigenetics moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Archigenetics. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Aesurias (talk) 00:54, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm trying my best. I'll review some theories and I'll republish again once they're good and complete. Archupnet (talk) 01:02, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf^(talk) 00:26, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Archupnet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

AbuAmmo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My original username archiupnet was chosen three years ago. It is the name of the architectural platform where I am a high profile contributor, and I was unaware at the time that this type of organizational name violated Wikipedia username policy. To be clear, I am an established and financially independent architectural critic, known professionally as "IBRA Fawakherji" I have never received, nor will I ever receive, any form of compensation for my contributions. My professional life is in an entirely different field, and my sole intent on Wikipedia is to update outdated information and add missing data on significant architectural topics, a task I take seriously as a critic. I have now reviewed the policies regarding promotion and sourcing. I understand a link I added for documentation purposes which, in my view, was a single instance related to one architectwas flagged as promotional. Having reviewed the guidelines, I believe the best path forward is to focus my contributions on adding and correcting factual information, and I will refrain from adding external links to avoid any appearance of promotion. I trust my independent, critical perspective will be a valuable asset to the project. Archupnet (talk) 14:54, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm not unblocking someone who talks to other editors like that. -- asilvering (talk) 05:04, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

While this unblock request addresses many of my concerns regarding the specific block, I am deeply concerned about your "discussion" below, which is highly incivil. Civility is part of Wikipedia's code of conduct and one of its five pillars. Please address concerns about collaborating with other editors. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:21, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Food delivery, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 14:58, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

@Theroadislong: This user is already blocked. Aydoh8^{[what have I done now?]} 15:02, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

I must clarify that this was not "promotional material."

I was adding a sourced, relevant concept regarding the architectural infrastructure required for modern food delivery—a topic directly relevant to the article.

You are mischaracterizing the documentation of a new, notable concept as "advertising." My intent is purely encyclopedic. Archupnet (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

@Aydoh8 & @Theroadislong

Stop this absurd, baby school like bureaucracy. I challenge you to find one non factual edit I've made.

This platform’s hypocrisy is stunning. You block free, expert, sourced content as "promotion," only to have editors email content owners soliciting payment to publish the exact same facts.

This isn't an encyclopedia; it's a pay-to-play racket.

Escalate this request to someone higher than you. I want this message seen by your leadership I have the facts and documents to prove it. Archupnet (talk) 18:54, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

There is no leadership here we edit by consensus. Theroadislong (talk) 18:59, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

If this is your stance, then you are completely incompetent to delete a "new science" being added to a professional field. Your colleague @Aydoh8 is just as bad, deleting a new architectural code under the guise of "promotion."

Promotion of what? It is not for sale. It is a serious intellectual contribution.

This is encyclopedic knowledge. If you don't understand the subject, don't edit it. Stop talking about things you clearly do not comprehend. Archupnet (talk) 19:12, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:23, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Archigenetics (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Archigenetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:00, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ibrahim Nawaf Jawharji (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ibrahim Nawaf Jawharji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Archigenetics

Hello, Archupnet. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Archigenetics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Archigenetics

Hello, Archupnet. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Archigenetics".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:26, 1 May 2026 (UTC)