Archive 40Archive 42Archive 43Archive 44Archive 45Archive 46Archive 50

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded Bradv

Oversighter changes

readded Bradv

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.

Lucier (restaurant)

Thanks for the heads up! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:20, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
No worries. I flagged uncited three direct quotations in the lede and I was about to tag the "Reception" --> "The Oregonian" subsection as {{undue}} but I didn't think the template message was appropriate here. That subsection is far out of proportion to the rest of the section and the article. I understand The Oregonian is a major source for the article but it shouldn't dominate. Anyway, good luck with the article and your planned GA nom. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 01:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
@Baffle gab1978 Thanks! I will fix the lead. Yes, I agree re: The Oregonian. Much appreciated! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2023)

WikiCup 2023 September newsletter

Your GA nomination of LGBT and Wikipedia

The article LGBT and Wikipedia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:LGBT and Wikipedia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cambalachero -- Cambalachero (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

@Cambalachero My co-nominators and I have replied to your feedback, if you're interested in revisiting the discussion before we re-nominate. Either way, thanks and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Re-nominated ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:52, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of 2022 Philadelphia shooting for deletion

Resolved

September GOCE newsletter

This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2023)

This Month in GLAM: August 2023

Books & Bytes – Issue 58

Nomination of Gimme Love (Sia song) for deletion

Resolved

Concern regarding Draft:Fashion Photo RuView

Resolved

Nomination of Paulie Calafiore for deletion

Resolved
Please leave me alone.---Another Believer (Talk) 13:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

  • Featured content: Catching up
    Covering all of August. Pretty much.

This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2023)

Edit summaries

Another Believer. I see you have fallen into the sloppy habit of not leaving proper edit summaries, if you ever did leave edit summaries. While I don't think leaving edit summaries is mandatory, leaving + and - signs indicating you have either added or subtracted textual content from the article isn't really good enough for a profligate article creator, particularly since of the edit changes are relatively large. I would suggest you start using them on a regular basis. I will check back in a couple weeks. If you haven't I'll take you to admin. scope_creepTalk 14:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

LEAVE. ME. ALONE. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Green GA Editathon October 2023 - Around the World in 31 Days

2023 Vancouver Michelin Ratings

It's worth mentioning that the restaurants listed here: https://guide.michelin.com/us/en/article/dining-out/michelin-guide-vancouver-new-additions-restaurants aren't necessarily Michelin starred. They have been added to the guide for 2023 but we don't yet know the rating. They could be Bib Gourmands or other ratings beneath a Michelin star. Expandinglight5 (talk) 17:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

@Expandinglight5 Ah! Good to know, thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Loosey LaDuca

Your GA nomination of Loosey LaDuca

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Loosey LaDuca you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 14:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Loosey LaDuca

The article Loosey LaDuca you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Loosey LaDuca and Talk:Loosey LaDuca/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 14:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Loosey LaDuca

The article Loosey LaDuca you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Loosey LaDuca for comments about the article, and Talk:Loosey LaDuca/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 16:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:24, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
@Voorts By the way, if you happen to be interested in a similar topic, I've also nominated Mistress Isabelle Brooks. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2023)

Edits to Baroness Joanna Shields page

Restaurants

Women in Red October 2023

This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2023)

Purr Cocktail Lounge

Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

  • Featured content: By your logic,
    The first issue to feature two poetry article

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

#IABot

This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2023)

Your GA nomination of Mistress Isabelle Brooks

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mistress Isabelle Brooks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lijil -- Lijil (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Justice For J6

This Month in GLAM: September 2023

Drag Race Italia

Your GA nomination of Mistress Isabelle Brooks

The article Mistress Isabelle Brooks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mistress Isabelle Brooks for comments about the article, and Talk:Mistress Isabelle Brooks/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lijil -- Lijil (talk) 10:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

@Lijil Thanks again for reviewing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Seattle Center navbox

This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2023)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2023)

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

Women in Red - November 2023

Wow, I think?!

I just saw this. Congratulations! ☆ Bri (talk) 19:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

@Bri How interesting! Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Bipartisan Cafe

Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Election denial movement for deletion

50,000 list

Hi, any reason why you stopped adding your name by the many articles you've created? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld I dunno, to make the contributions less about me and more about the goal? I keep getting targeted for my work, especially w/r/t restaurant entries, so I'm less motivated to put my username all over the page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
There are a lot of restaurants in Seattle! :-) ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:45, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
@Dr. Blofeld Can you tell that to the editors who seem to think there are only like 5 restaurants in the whole city? :p ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2023)