Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 26)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Anonpriest! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azar Habib (November 27)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Avenues night.jpg

edit

A tag has been placed on File:Avenues night.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fvuukrw7ih0qb1.png and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Ирука13 08:28, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Iruka13 The reddit post was my own post. Please explain how I can prove it. Anonpriest (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Even if the Reddit account where this image was posted is yours, that doesn't in any way prove that the image (ie. the copyright thereof) is yours, which is the issue at stake here. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
@DoubleGrazing Here's a photo I had taken just before taking the one I had uploaded, notice the date of the image and the angle, lighting, camera angle etc : https://imgur.com/a/date-of-image-cgitTmX?third_party=1
I had uploaded the reddit post on September 23 2023 Anonpriest (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Let me rephrase that for you: "here's another image that someone has posted on another website".
What does that tell us about who owns the copyright in the image uploaded to Wikipedia? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
@DoubleGrazing I uploaded this image around the same time as another image
(Juffair night.jpg) which was also taken from the same phone in the same country and that photo has been properly uploaded as it has been verified as being original. Why would I post one original photo and another stolen photo? Is there any way you reckon I can prove that the photo is indeed mine? The phone I took the photo with is my old one that I've replaced since so send suggestions of providing proof accordingly thank you. Anonpriest (talk) 09:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Here's a post that I made on r/wikipedia seeking help using the same reddit account
https://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/1h9f19c/how_to_prove_that_a_photo_i_want_to_upload_on/
And here's me following one of the comment's advice.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CityPorn/comments/16q5a8d/manama_bahrain/
Hope this works as any proof. Anonpriest (talk) 09:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
A year ago? You can write to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. — Ирука13 08:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Azar Habib

edit

Information icon Hello, Anonpriest. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Azar Habib, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Azar Habib

edit

Hello, Anonpriest. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Azar Habib".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Ranveer Allahbadia

edit

Information icon Hello, Anonpriest. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ranveer Allahbadia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ranveer Allahbadia

edit

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ranveer Allahbadia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Previously was deleted under G13, thought of tagging it for the same. However Ranveer Allahbadia already exists and this draft serves no purpose.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rejoy2003(talk) 18:11, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026

edit

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Algerian War when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Zackmann08 Hi, thanks a lot! Will keep this in mind moving forward. Anonpriest (talk) 16:37, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply