Akshadev

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Akshadev. Thank you for your work on Vikram-II. Another editor, Cptabhiimanyuseven, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Akshadev, thank you for creating this article in Draft Submission and for submitting it for review through Articles for Creation. I would also suggest adding more reliable references to further establish the article’s notability. In addition, please add appropriate categories to improve the article’s organisation and discoverability.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cptabhiimanyuseven}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cptabhiimanyuseven •[@píng mє] 15:34, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Participation in move requests

Hello Akshadev, it appears that you have been participating in move requests again, here on May 20 and with a !vote here today. As we discussed at Talk:Salt Lake Stadium#Requested move 12 March 2025 and on my talk page, this is in violation of your conditional unblock unless and until you have appealed its conditions. The proper procedure is to ask for the conditions to be lifted first. Have you done so? Dekimasuよ! 04:20, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

@Dekimasu: No, I haven't. Can you guide me how to ask for the conditions to be lifted? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 04:33, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

As noted on the linked pages, "After the blocked user has accepted the conditions and been unblocked, the conditions may be appealed only to the unblocking administrator or to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard." The unblocking administrator is not active, so the correct place to ask for the conditions to be lifted is WP:AN. Again, the proper time to do this is before beginning to edit in the restricted area again, not to edit in that area and wait to see if someone will notice. Our previous discussion on this is at User talk:Dekimasu#Participation in RM discussions, where you specifically said "I will not violate the restrictions anymore and I will apply for the full rights some time later". Dekimasuよ! 08:10, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

@Dekimasu: I asked for the conditions to be lifted at WP:AN, which was unsuccessful, because I violated the restrictions. And I'm good with that decision. Now I want to ask you that when can I request again for my restrictions to be lifted? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 13:33, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

There is no specific timing, but the timing should ideally reflect that the restrictions are no longer necessary. I think Tamzin explained this in more detail. Best, Dekimasuよ! 05:02, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram-I has been accepted

Vikram-I, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cptabhiimanyuseven •[@píng mє] 03:19, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Skyroot Aerospace is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Skyroot Aerospace is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OzmoOzmo -- OzmoOzmo (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Akshadev! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Nomination for speedy deletion, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Akshadev! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Need help to remove copyvios, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Akshadev! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Reliable sources (India) doesn't work, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 4 June 2026 (UTC)