Achille610IT

Your submission at Articles for creation: Galloni.net (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Galloni.net and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:26, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Achille610IT! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:26, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Galloni.net has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Galloni.net. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:49, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Draft:Galloni.net. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:49, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Galloni.net, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:57, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Draft:Galloni.net, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 15:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Draft:Galloni.net. Theroadislong (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Toadspike [Talk] 10:55, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Galloni.net

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Galloni.net, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toadspike [Talk] 11:06, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for reviewing my edits

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Achille610IT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello, and thank you for reviewing my edits. I understand the issues raised. I did not intend to promote or advertise, and I now realize that the draft lacked sufficient independent reliable sources and appeared promotional. I am willing to rewrite the draft from scratch in a neutral, encyclopedic tone, based solely on independent third-party sources, and will not remove maintenance templates again. I request to be unblocked to continue contributing constructively. Thank you. Achille610IT (talk) 14:48, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You're blocked, not chatgpt. Please use your own voice. asilvering (talk) 05:59, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Achille610IT (talk) 14:48, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Capisco il rifiuto del precedente messaggio

{{unblock|reason=Ciao. Capisco il rifiuto del precedente messaggio: era scritto in modo troppo formale e capisco come questo possa sembrare generato da AI. Provo a spiegarmi meglio con parole mie.

Non stavo cercando di fare pubblicità. Ho capito che la bozza che avevo scritto non aveva ancora i requisiti di una voce enciclopedica e che ho sbagliato a rimuovere i template di avviso. È stato un errore dovuto all'inesperienza, non a cattiva intenzione.

Vorrei solo poter continuare a contribuire normalmente a Wikipedia, usando la sandbox per imparare e senza ripetere questi errori. Se venissi sbloccato, rispetterei le linee guida, eviterei toni promozionali e non rimuoverei più i template. Achille610IT (talk) 07:50, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for reviewing my edits

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Achille610IT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • filter log • creation log)

Request reason:

Hello, and thank you for reviewing my edits. I understand the issues raised. I did not intend to promote or advertise, and I now realize that the draft lacked sufficient independent reliable sources and appeared promotional. I am willing to rewrite the draft from scratch in a neutral, encyclopedic tone, based solely on independent third-party sources, and will not remove maintenance templates again. I request to be unblocked to continue contributing constructively. Thank you. Achille610IT (talk) 14:48, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You're blocked, not chatgpt. Please use your own voice. asilvering (talk) 05:59, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Achille610IT (talk) 14:48, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Capisco il rifiuto del precedente messaggio

{{unblock|reason=Ciao. Capisco il rifiuto del precedente messaggio: era scritto in modo troppo formale e capisco come questo possa sembrare generato da AI. Provo a spiegarmi meglio con parole mie.

Non stavo cercando di fare pubblicità. Ho capito che la bozza che avevo scritto non aveva ancora i requisiti di una voce enciclopedica e che ho sbagliato a rimuovere i template di avviso. È stato un errore dovuto all'inesperienza, non a cattiva intenzione.

Vorrei solo poter continuare a contribuire normalmente a Wikipedia, usando la sandbox per imparare e senza ripetere questi errori. Se venissi sbloccato, rispetterei le linee guida, eviterei toni promozionali e non rimuoverei più i template. Achille610IT (talk) 07:50, 6 November 2025 (UTC)_Subscript Achille610IT (talk) 10:23, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Achille610IT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Ciao. Capisco perché la richiesta precedente è stata respinta: era troppo formale e poteva sembrare scritta con un assistente. Provo a spiegarmi semplicemente.

Non stavo cercando di fare pubblicità. Ho capito che la bozza che avevo creato non era adatta e che ho sbagliato rimuovendo i template. È stato un errore da principiante, non intenzionale.

Vorrei solo tornare a contribuire normalmente e migliorare imparando, usando la sandbox e chiedendo aiuto quando serve. Se vengo sbloccato, rispetterò le linee guida e non rimuoverò più avvisi.

Grazie per l'attenzione. Achille610IT (talk) 10:24, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unblock requests that are not written in English are not considered. You are not blocked on the Italian Wikipedia; you are welcome to edit there if you wish.

Google Translate: Le richieste di sblocco non scritte in inglese non saranno prese in considerazione. Non sei bloccato sulla Wikipedia italiana; sei libero di modificare lì se lo desideri. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:01, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Achille610IT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello. I understand why the previous request was declined. I did not realize that unblock requests here must be written in English. I will explain my situation clearly.

I did not intend to promote anything. I now understand that the draft I created did not meet Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing requirements, and I also understand that removing maintenance templates was a mistake caused by inexperience, not bad faith.

I would like to continue editing constructively and learn how to contribute correctly. If unblocked, I will work in my sandbox, ask for help when I am unsure, and avoid removing maintenance templates.

I am simply asking for another chance to participate in good faith.

Thank you. Achille610IT (talk) 10:30, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:00, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment), Hi, I've moved your latest unblock request to the bottom of the page so it's easy to understand the timeline.

To help us understand that happened, can you let us know what your relationship is to the subject of your article? What prompted you to write about them as your first edit on Wikipedia?

I also see that you've probably used AI/LLM/Chatbots in the past, if so please avoid using them here - see WP:NICETRY for an explanation. Blue Sonnet (talk) 11:54, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your message. I understand the concern. To answer your question clearly: the subject of the article is myself. I now realize that this creates a conflict of interest, and that I should not have tried to write a page about myself, especially as a new editor. I also now understand why the draft appeared promotional and why removing templates was inappropriate. These were mistakes caused by misunderstanding how Wikipedia works, not intentional disruption.

I would like to be unblocked so I can learn and contribute correctly to other topics, without editing pages about myself. If I ever work on a biography or page related to myself again, I will request help at WP:COI and avoid direct editing.

Thank you for considering my request. Achille610IT (talk) 16:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi again, it looks like you might still be using AI/LLM or perhaps a translator tool, can you please confirm this? Apologies if I'm incorrect, but it'll help us to understand the type of support you might need going forwards if English isn't your first language.

Regarding biographies, this isn't really what Wikipedia is for. It's an encyclopedia above all else, so there are strict criteria for what qualifies for an article. I recommend taking a few moments to read up on the WP:Verifiability and WP:NPOV policies, so you understand how Wikipedia works and why there were problems with your original article.

Blocks are only ever intended to prevent disruption to the encyclopedia, so you need to persuade an admin that you understand exactly what you did wrong and how to avoid doing the same thing in future - reading those policies will help you to do that.

That's also why I mentioned AI/LLM's earlier - they aren't really tolerated in unblock requests because AI can't understand the problem and stop it happening again, only you can do that.

If you're unblocked, which specific areas or topics would you be interested in working on? Blue Sonnet (talk) 00:13, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply and clarification.

English is not my first language, so in some cases I used translation assistance to help express myself more clearly, but I understand now that I must write directly in my own words and avoid any phrasing that appears generated or non-neutral.

I also understand the core issue: I should not create or edit pages about myself or businesses I am connected to, as that falls under Conflict of Interest (WP:COI) and is not appropriate for Wikipedia. I will avoid this entirely going forward.

I have now read the guidelines you linked, especially WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:COI, and I understand the importance of reliable sources, neutral tone, and avoiding promotional or self-referential content.

If unblocked, I would like to contribute only to neutral topics I have experience in — specifically

• Web accessibility practices
• Open-source documentation improvements
• Italian cultural / historical locations (where verifiable sources exist)

I will not return to editing anything related to myself, my work, or associated organizations.

Thank you for considering this request. ~2025-32346-99 (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi again, please reply at the bottom of the page, I've moved your comment from the middle. You also need to edit whilst logged in so we know it's you.

This reads like it was written by AI or a chatbot, except you've said you understand that it's important to respond in your own words. If I'm right on this, can you please try to do that here? If you're not able to discuss the matter without tools, then that could affect your ability to edit English Wikipedia.

It doesn't have to be perfect, but you're blocked & the AI isn't, so you need to write your own posts. Please also see WP:NICETRY and WP:LLMCIR. Apologies if I'm wrong, but this looks extremely similar to AI-written responses. Blue Sonnet (talk) 09:09, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your patience.

I understand your point, and I want to make it clear that I will not try to create or edit any page about myself again. I see now that this is a conflict of interest, and that Wikipedia is not the right place to promote or describe myself or my work.

Regarding the language: yes, English is not my first language, and sometimes I used translation help because I wanted to make my messages easier to understand. But I understand now that this caused confusion, so I will write normally, in my own words, even if it is not perfect, is better that i write in english

My intention was not to cause problems. I really did not understand how Wikipedia works at the beginning, and now I see why my edits were not appropriate. I would like to be unblocked so I can learn and contribute to other topics (not related to myself). For example, I can help with pages about Italian locations, history, or general technical topics where I have no personal involvement.

Thank you for considering this message and i ope that you understend my intention.

~2025-32346-99 (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi again and thanks for the response, but please make sure you're logged in when you respond so we can be sure you're the person who's replying. There's currently a backlog of requests, but an admin will get to your appeal as soon as they can. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! In addition to the promotional editing, I notice that you have multiple warnings before the block informing you not to remove maintenance templates. Can you explain why you ignored these warnings? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)