Hello, AcademicEditorIN, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! MrActiniuMtalk08:20, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 23 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:
Hello, AcademicEditorIN!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thilsebatti (talk) 11:06, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
Source 2, the CV, goes 404, and source 4 is blocked outside India. The CV is essential here, and ideally you would have further sourcing. I can see a case under NACADEMIC criteria 1, but we still need good sources.
Next steps
Edit Draft:Abid Haleem to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Latest comment: 7 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:
I understand the concerns regarding independent secondary sources. However, the article is being submitted primarily under WP:PROF rather than WP:GNG, as substantial biographical media coverage of the subject appears limited. A previous AfC reviewer commented that the subject "certainly fulfils WP:PROF".
Could you please clarify what additional sourcing or evidence would be needed to demonstrate compliance with WP:PROF in this case? I would be happy to improve the draft further based on your guidance.
