MrActiniuM

CS1 error on Warwick Farm railway station

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Warwick Farm railway station, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

You appear to be trying to break a long standing convention for Australian rolling stock articles that always includes both the operator or system and class name, not just the class name in the lead sentence. Per the WP:BRD, process, to implement the changes you are seeking is going to need a WP:CONSENSUS. Donrownski (talk) 22:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi MrActiniuM! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of New South Wales Endeavour railcar. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:New South Wales Endeavour railcar, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:30, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

About your signature

Hi! I saw your report at WP:UAA and I noticed that your signature may cause problems for some editors. In particular, editors who are red-green colourblind will have difficulty reading the 'talk' text because it is red text on a green background. This could confuse them. To make your signature more accessible, I recommend changing the background and/or text colour so that one is significantly darker than the other. Best regards, QwertyForest (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Transport in Jervis Bay Territory

Hello, MrActiniuM. I've merged the content of Transport in Jervis Bay Territory into Jervis Bay Territory due to the article having a non-notable topic and being short enough to fit into the main article. Opm581 ^{(talk | he/him)} 10:49, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

OK thats fine. I wans just doing it for the Wikiproject anyway. MrActiniuMtalk 10:52, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Mz7 (talk) 03:19, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

About Transport in Tasmania - no worries, happy to help out

Hi MrActiniuM,

When I saw your message on the article talk page, my first thoughts were:

• Oh, the sad demise of the Tasman Limited - what a tourist attraction it would have been if it was still running now...
• Tasmanian Freight Equalisation Scheme - would a link to that article be relevant, given that it is about transport from Tasmania to "the mainland"?
• Convict tramway might be something to include there, perhaps?

Peter in Melbourne (I haven't actually lived in Tasmania for a long time) aka Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 08:55, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

@Shirt58 Thanks so much MrActiniuMtalk 08:56, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi MrActiniuM, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:28, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Transport in Victoria (state) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Transport in Victoria (state). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it has been 19 hours since you placed {{Under construction}} on the article. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

Hello MrActiniuM,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

1994 Waterfall rail accident moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 1994 Waterfall rail accident. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it contains almost no content at present. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JavaHurricane 06:01, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

A tip for your future articles: rather than leaving a one-line stub that potentially meets WP:A3 in mainspace for several hours with only an {{under construction}} tempplate on it, work on the article in draftspace. You need not use WP:AFC for such drafts; I think you know the P&Gs well enough to know when the draft would be "ready" or "suitable" for mainspace, and you can move the draft to mainspace yourself at that time. JavaHurricane 06:07, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of PS Canally

The page PS Canally has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dec1994WaterfallRailCrash.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dec1994WaterfallRailCrash.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

British Royal Family

Hi Mr. ActiniuM. At on British Royal Family, you reverted as "blatant vandalism". Did you mean to do that? meamemg (talk) 15:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Yes as a part of my pending changes patrol. The edit that IP made did not appear to make sense in any way. MrActiniuM ☢️talk 21:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero Emission Buses Program (New South Wales) has been accepted

Zero Emission Buses Program (New South Wales), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MrActiniuM ☢️talk 08:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 12 June 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 5 June 2026 (UTC)