AK0934

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Tripoli (1705). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 18:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Barbary Crusade, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at List of wars involving Tunisia . Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 23:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Capture of djerba and karknah moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Capture of djerba and karknah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Emirate of banu talis

Hello, AK0934,

Thank you for creating Emirate of banu talis.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Book references require page numbers

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 21:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of wars involving Tunisia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 19:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

You have been clearly warned to stop edit-warring. If you repeat your edit again without discussion, like this, the next recourse may be to report you to administrators, who may place restrictions on your account. R Prazeres (talk) 19:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

i know i know i am not in a war you have to know AK0934 (talk) 22:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

• Editors who edit war, and create sleeper accounts in the midst of edit wars, are very often socks.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

{{unblock|I did not mean to upset anyone, and I did not understand any of your warnings, and I confirm that I only used one account, so I am sorry for any problem that occurred. AK0934 (talk) 23:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)}}

AK0934 (talk) 00:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Capture of djerba and karknah

Hello, AK0934. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capture of djerba and karknah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Capture of djerba and karknah

Hello, AK0934. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Capture of djerba and karknah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AK0934 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to appeal the block on my original account, AK0943. I understand that I made a mistake by creating and using a new account (youssef khedhri 2011) while my original account was blocked. I now fully understand that this was a violation of Wikipedia's sockpuppet policies. I sincerely apologize for any confusion or disruption my actions may have caused. I recognize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and am committed to following them moving forward. I am genuinely dedicated to contributing positively to Wikipedia and would like to request the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to the community. If you could reconsider unblocking my original account, I assure you that I will abide by all Wikipedia policies and contribute constructively. I deeply regret the confusion my actions have caused and sincerely hope for another opportunity to contribute positively. I genuinely care about being a part of the Wikipedia community and am committed to adhering to all guidelines Thank you for considering my appeal. If there are any additional steps I need to take or further information required, please let me know.AK0934 (talk) 17:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I concur that a request before six months has passed will not succeed- and one after that is very unlikely to suceed that soon; at least a year or more is probably needed. I suggest that in the meantime you edit a Wikimedia Foundation project where you are not blocked(Simple English Wikipeida, Wikitionary, or another language Wikipedia in a language you may know) to build up a good edit history which might help you get unblocked here. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

come on when im being unblocked wikipedia you have to see my appeal i want to edit AK0934 (talk) 16:58 6 August 2024

Demanding to be unblocked has been helpful approximately zero times in Wikipedia history. Considering you're a blocked user who has sockpuppeted, there's already a very big trust deficit with you as it is. You're blocked precisely because at the moment, Wikipedia doesn't want you to edit and you have to convince an admin to change their mind and have faith in you. This is a very poor way to go about that. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

How can i contact an admin, why this site is so strict that "unblocke has been helpful approximately zero times in Wikipedia history." at least can you tell me where is wikipedia base or the wikipedia number, and im gonna be banned for ever from using wikipedia ?? please answer me AK0934 (talk) 00;06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

That's not what I said at all. I said demanding to be unblocked is never effective. In every one of your block notices across multiple accounts, there are numerous links about Wikipedia policies and a guide to appealing blocks. You would be wise to read those pages. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 02:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

what pages ?? AK0934 (talk) 17:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

• Checkuser note You were socking as recently as August 5. If you want to have a chance at being unblocked, you will need to follow the instructions at WP:SO.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

  were should i "Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban." ?? AK0934 (talk) 12:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

  You should make that promise in an unblock request, after a lot of time has passed. I doubt six months will be enough time given your repeated conduct. If you really would like to post again, you should wait a couple of years, making sure to have no edits on English Wikipedia during that time, meaning nothing on your talk page, no logged out editing to evade your block, and no more sockpuppets. Then make your case, as honestly as possible, and have concrete points showing you understand what you did, and how you will change your behavior if allowed to post again. And if you really want to have the best chance, become an active productive editor on another Wikimedia project. You're not blocked on any of them and you've already made a few edits to Arabic Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Being a productive editor who follows the rules elsewhere makes a more convincing case that you can be one here.

  And just to get the idea out of your head, there's almost certainly no promise, no plea, no combination of words that will convince any admin to lift your block now, or anytime soon. You may not like the idea, but your only chance to return to English Wikipedia ever likely involves a significant amount of time away from it. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

  I hope"you should wait a couple of years" was an exaggeration from you. Otherwise I am willing to abide by everything you have written. AK0934 (talk) 12:27, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

  It was not. You can try the minimum of six months in WP:SO, but I don't think the bare minimum will suffice. I'm only outlining for you what the most likely chance that you'll be able to post again is; you are quite free to disregard it. Please note that even this is far from a guarantee you'll be unblocked. Trust, once lost, is difficult to earn. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Emirate of Banu Talis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emirate of Banu Talis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emirate of Banu Talis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

R Prazeres (talk) 07:33, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Leave me alone AK0934 (talk) 17:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AK0934 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Happy 2025 wikipedia, long time no see, 11 months exactly, isn't it a perfect time for me to get unblocked, this was all a mistake from the beginning. Please wiki im sure I will be very helpful on your site. im ready to wait another year but forgivnes is better. more then that im working in arabic wikipedia and wikimedia commons, you can chek my achievments there. and thank you best regards.AK0934 (talk) 17:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No evidence of good faith, see Ponyo's comment below — The Anome (talk) 20:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You were socking just last month (this edit is particularly troubling). Directly above this appeal there is a notification of a deletion discussion provided for one of your articles, and your response to the person who notified you was "go away". I very much doubt your appeal will be granted.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
• This account is not mine it's my friend account, and i said "leave me alone" not "go away" and i don't think this is an insult or a bad word. and why are you asking me to delete my page while im blocked ?? "I very much doubt your appeal will be granted" it will be garanted, wikipedia laws say you can't be banned forever, maybe for a year or more but not for ever, more then that i help the society and i benefit with new historical events that no one added before.-- AK0934 22:49, 10 january 2025 (UTC)

There's no rule on Wikipedia that says you can't be banned forever.

~1 Im gonna be unblocked one day, im sure of that.

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AK0934 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Happy new year wikipedia, it have been a long time since i was blocked, 2 years propably, i spent all this time in Arabic Wikipedia, i did so many good things there, hundreds of pages and thousands of edits that helped in spreading knowledge, and i fully understood the laws of Wikipedia during my experience, which is something i didn't do when i was blocked the first time in my main account (AK0934) two years ago. i am ready to return back with a good faith and fresh start, i wish that you can give me a second chance and thank you. AK0934 (talk) 17:31, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Duplicate appeal. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:51, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No immediately obvious technical evidence of block evasion this time. --Yamla (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

i understand now what is Sockpup,petry, i understand now what are the legetimate and illegitemate uses of it, now that i know i will never use them anymore, i wish this can help me get unblocked. AK0934 (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Support for unblock request. I agree that this user should be unblocked. He seems to have learned his lesson. Why don't you give him a chance? He probably won't sockpuppet again, and if he does, you can block him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zuglicnzg (talk • contribs) 18:27, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the support. AK0934 (talk) 19:43, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Zuglicnzg. This was your account's first ever comment, may we know how you found that user talk page? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:18, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

as this might look suspicious. i need to confirm that i don't own this account (Zuglicnzg), and i don't know who owns it. secondly, i am fully aware that using sockpuppet accounts for Creating an illusion of support is an illegetimate usage. you can follow the IP adress and make sure of that, Yamla confirmed too that i didn't try to block evade. AK0934 (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I cannot see the IP address myself, although I wouldn't be opposed to Yamla running another check on the newer account. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

good, go and check then, and you will see that im saying the truth. and why would i do the same mistakes twice and cost my self to remain blocked for another year. AK0934 (talk) 15:17, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Totally unrelated, I have no concerns. -- asilvering (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

i didn't understand, your not concerned about what ?? sir AK0934 (talk) 18:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Asilvering is saying that they checked that your account is completely unrelated to Zuglicnzg, and that they have no concerns about it being a sock of yours. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:53, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the explaining.

otherwise i wish that wikipedia takes this as a sign of good faith from me, and takes my unblock appeal seriously, and thank you. AK0934 (talk) 18:54, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

You're welcome! I'd prefer to leave your appeal to someone fluent in Arabic so they can look at your contributions on Arabic Wikipedia, but good luck! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Are any of the admins who do unblock requests fluent in Arabic? If not this might just be set in limbo for now. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 21:59, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

excuse me, im not banned in Arabic Wikipedia, i edit there everyday AK0934 (talk) 22:18, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I am not saying that. We don't have that many admins doing unblocks (or at least, from what I have seen, it seems that way). I would estimate 30, though admittedly that is just from what I have seen. Ideally, we would have an English administrator who knows Arabic review your contributions. I am unsure if any of the admins who frequently do unblocks actually know Arabic. If they don't, the unblock could be set in a limbo until someone who knows Arabic is able to review your contributions. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 22:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

alright, no problem, take your time. AK0934 (talk) 22:56, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Looking at Wikipedia:Administrators by language, our best bet would be User:Meno25, who is active and a sysop on both the English and Arabic Wikipedias. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:36, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

@45dogs, if you're curious, here's the last six months: . Imperfect stats, of course, since this only counts successful. full unblocks. -- asilvering (talk) 00:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the data :) 20-30 active unblock admins seems like a decent estimate. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 02:24, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

• As a procedural note, AK0934 is WP:3X banned and therefore this is a community ban which would need to be reviewed at WP:AN.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:43, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for the note. A WP:AN review could be better, as it gives us more chances to find qualified editors able to evaluate the relevant contributions. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:53, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

I was thinking the same, otherwise this appeal has the potential to sit for some time. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:19, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

@AK0934, are you okay with me forwarding your appeal to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard for review? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

can you explain to me what is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard and the current situation of my unblock appeal ?? AK0934 (talk) 18:38, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi! The hope is that we might find folks who are fluent in Arabic and familiar with the Arabic Wikipedia to vouch for your contributions there. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard is a discussion page intended for issues that administrators might find useful (although anyone can participate), such as ban appeals. The difference is that unlike a regular block, a ban can't be lifted by an individual admin, but is up to community discussion on that noticeboard. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:01, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

alright, no problem, forward my appeal to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. AK0934 (talk) 19:05, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

@AK0934, could you please rewrite your appeal with a brief description of why you were blocked? Community members will not be familiar with your block and are usually interested to hear why editors were blocked and what they learned from the experience. -- asilvering (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Seconding this request, I was prepared to add a short context but it could be much more helpful to hear it in your own words. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:59, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

alright, i should edit my unblock appeal, here in my talk page ?? AK0934 (talk) 20:11, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

You can just write a new appeal in a reply to this comment. -- asilvering (talk) 20:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

AK0934 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

once again, Happy New Year Wikipedia, i am AK0934, i was blocked for abusing the use of multiple sockpuppet accounts. At the end of 2023, i entered Wikipedia with the intention of editing articles related to history, specifically North African medieval history, During that time i became involved in an edit war on the article List of wars involving Tunisia, i received a warning and was temporarily prevented from editing. at the time, i mistakenly believed that i could simply create a new account and continue editing, like in social media platforms, i later learned that using sockpuppet accounts to evade a block is a violation of Wikipedia’s policies, unfortunately, even after realizing that this behavior was wrong, i refused to stop and openly challenged Wikipedia and its rules, Looking back after 2-3 years, i now understand that this behavior was foolish, immature, and that i was the wrong one all the time, the IP tracking system worked effectively, and all of my sock accounts were eventually identified, By the end of 2024 (as I recall), i decided to surrender and leave Wikipedia. However, i later reviewed the block appeal I submitted on 5 August 2024 and chose to follow the advice given to me by User:331dot, As a result, I began contributing to the Arabic Wikipedia, throughout 2025, i edited in Arabic Wikipedia, where i learned and gained a deeper understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, i believe i made many valuable contributions there including editing and creating and translating articles, through this experience and reflection on my past mistakes, i came to fully understand that I was completely in the wrong. Now, with greater maturity and understanding and good faith, I am returning to ask Wikipedia for a second chance. AK0934 (talk) 22:32, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Accept reason:

You have been unbanned by consensus of the Wikipedia community. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:52, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

to @asilvering: I made a new appeal with more details and explanation, is there anything else i should do. --AK0934 (talk) 22:37, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

I have posted your ban appeal on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:59, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

ok, thanks. AK0934 (talk) 22:14, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

If you get asked questions at AN, you can answer them here and I will forward the answers there. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:51, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, im not allowed from editing ot repsonding to anyone in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, is there a solution for that ?? AK0934 (talk) 01:07, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

The solution is what Chaotic Enby said. You can write something here, and someone will bring the response over. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 02:00, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Kowal2701: (not admin) AK0934, what led to the block was edit warring, can you please address this and outline how you will handle disputes if unblocked? They've made over 1,200 edits at ar.wiki and created/rewritten lots of articles related to medieval North African history, I can't read Arabic but they look good.

My Response: If i face any disputes after getting unblocked, i will go to the talk page of the article and discuss there. if my edits were deleted i will go the user who deleted them and ask him in his talk page for the reasons and settle it with him. and please i identify as a male, it's "he" not "they". AK0934 (talk) 11:38, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Toadspike [Talk]: Tentative support. I am not fluent in Arabic, but the request is decent and AK0934 has promised not to repeat the behaviors he was blocked for. He has also waited a year since his previous request, which is more than we ask for and which I take as a show of good faith. If problems re-occur, we can always re-block. If problems in his arwiki contributions are discovered, please ping me. (AK0934, the singular they is commonly used in English when someone's gender is unknown. I am happy to refer to you with "he", but if you resume editing on the English Wikipedia you should be aware that you will likely be referred to with "they" frequently. It is not an act of malice.)

My Response: Thank you for the support. and thanks for expaining, now i understood the singular they AK0934 (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Will you be able to continuously transfer my answers to Administrators' noticeboard? Won't that tire you? AK0934 (talk) 15:07, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

I invite you to only answer when specific questions are being asked to you, which you have a need to respond to. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:11, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

ok, understood AK0934 (talk) 15:21, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Battle of Kairouan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Kairouan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 03:02, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok. AK0934 (talk) 11:29, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

i can fix the language and the grammar, but the sources are limited, the ones in the page are the only ones i have. AK0934 (talk) 12:11, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Kairouan (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Kairouan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 17:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Grammar issue

I appreciate your expansion of articles, but please double check your grammar beforehand, or stick to other languages in wikipedia. Yaghmosus (talk) 10:47, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

alright , i will correct my articles grammar AK0934 (talk) 13:33, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Fitna of al-Andalus

Hello @AK0934, I really appreciate your edites in the "Fitna of al-Andalus" topic, truly a great work, you even made the second phase and without any major issues, but I made some changes in the article, please take a look, if you disagree with me, let's have a conversation in the talk chat and improve it together. Thank you. Wikiknight7 (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fihrids, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tripoli was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I fixed it, thank you for informing me, i thought if i just put Tripoli it would link to the capital of Libya, but i will be more detailed in the future. AK0934 (talk) 21:05, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abd al-Rahman ibn Habib al-Fihri, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:38, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Fixed it AK0934 (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2026 (UTC)