Your submission at Articles for creation: Igor Kopystiansky (June 10)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, 95.91.243.66! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Igor Kopystiansky (June 11)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
probably passes WP:NARTIST, but will need independent reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Igor Kopystiansky (June 11)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
still zero independent, reliable sources?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
there are reliable independent sources at the https://kopystiansky.tumblr.com/
works in major museum collections: https://www.moma.org/collection/works/131030?classifications=any&date_begin=Pre-1850&date_end=2019&locale=en&page=1&q=kopystiansky&with_images=1
https://whitney.org/collection/works/33136
https://americanart.si.edu/search?query=kopystiansky
https://www.metmuseum.org/search-results?q=kopystiansky
and etc. at the list
https://www.metmuseum.org/search-results?q=kopystiansky 95.91.243.66 (talk) 13:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
There is an archive at the most important European museum
https://www.centrepompidou.fr/fr/ressources/archive/yiaLi5D
a proof of the recognized professional standing 95.91.243.66 (talk) 13:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Igor Kopystiansky has a new comment

edit
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Igor Kopystiansky. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Igor Kopystiansky (June 11)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources are not optional

edit

Articles must contain links to reliable, independent, third-party sources. The subject's own website is not such a source, nor are their social media pages, blogs, DeviantArt or Tumblr pages, Google Image search results, and the like. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Igor Kopystiansky (June 25)

edit
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: issues have been ignored.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:31, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
this is a biased decision to block the reliable information about the artist represented in more then in 20 important museum collections of the US, Western Europe. 95.91.243.66 (talk) 14:44, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Igor Kopystiansky

edit

Information icon Hello, 95.91.243.66. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Igor Kopystiansky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply