Potential articles

edit

The Pink article seems interesting, particularly how the section headings and subheadings are organized. It seems like it could use a better structure. "In symbolism and culture" and "in nature and culture" feel odd to read because it tells me there is an overlap, or at least it feels that way. There could be some reorganizing you could do. I also see some stuff throughout the article that deserves a citation but doesn't have one, which is a WP:V issue. I'm assigning you this one. Dr.ozkul (talk) 12:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Model Articles

edit
  • Scottish art in the nineteenth century : In the talk page, one editor seemed to take care of concerns that were posted throughout the article. It is a mostly single-author article, where it is praised for being well written, factually accurate, broad in content, and follows the neutral point of view policy. It also refers to art, which I believe would be a good article in reference to my article being a color.
  • Art in early modern Scotland : I chose this article because it has the same singular author as the last article I chose. It had great praise for the same aspects of the article. I think What I find most appealing about this article is that the editor/author always replied to comments and fixed or took into consideration their recommended edits.
  • The Tribute Money (Masaccio) : I chose this article because it is about an art piece that uses a lot of the color pink. It has short, good subtitles. It seems to pass the six criteria for being a good article and has no objections in the talk page.