Talk:Yaropolk Iziaslavich

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Good articleYaropolk Iziaslavich has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 31, 2008Good article nomineeListed
May 24, 2025Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 3, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the 11th century Duke Yaropolk Izyaslavich is an Eastern Orthodox saint?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written:
    Pass. The article is well written although there are a few typos in the lead.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:
    Pass. The article seems to be accurate and has numerous citations and references.
  3. It is broad in its coverage:
    Pass. The article seems to have a broad coverage of the topic. It has a section describing the Yaropolk's family background as well as a legacy section.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:
    'Pass. The article follows WP:NPOV.
  5. It is stable:
    Pass. Yes, the article is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
    Pass. Yes, the article has numerous images and it is also strongly backed up by an infobox and a template.
  7. Overall:
    Pass. The article is well written and in my opinion it meets the criteria of a good article, so I have decided to pass it. Kyriakos (talk) 07:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. RMCD bot 20:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article review

edit

It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and saw that is lots of uncited prose and two "source needed" orange banners from 2023. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:28, 4 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:52, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Uncited paragraph in the "Death and legacy" section and two orange "more sources needed" banners in "Ancestry" and "Family". Z1720 (talk) 19:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Done, added all the missing references.LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 06:33, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.