| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Witte de With article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OR
editWhich part is OR causing it to be tagged? RJFJR (talk) 02:46, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- No OR is present, though of course the article sorely lacks sources yet...--MWAK (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Witte de With/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| This is a great article, but titles must be putten on it, to make it easier to read; for the restof it: keep up the good work, and I liked the article very much! From: -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 07:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 07:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)






