Talk:William Jennings Bryan

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Yavneh in topic Other affiliations

Wrong photograph

edit

Something is wrong about the photograph captured "Bryan campaigning for President, October 1896." I have no idea who this politician might be, but it's definitely not Bryan. This person must be a contemporary of JFK. 217.94.198.148 (talk) 22:34, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply


Although the photo appears quite modern, it does seem to be authentic. The original can be viewed on the Library of Congress website at the following link: http://loc.gov/pictures/resource/cph.3f06259/ . It looks like someone did a good job of restoring it before they posted it. Patr2016 (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Huh? Ratio of what? to what? for what? Why? WTF?

edit

Bryan demanded Bimetallism and "Free Silver" at a ratio of 16:1.


Makes no sense at all. Article should either explain what it means or delete.66.25.171.16 (talk) 19:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, an anon editor had vandalised the page so I've undone these changes, along with the unsourced addition of "The British Blockade of Germany was illegal under international law, as it contravened the Hague Convention of 1907." Without even considering whether or not this has any validity, we'd need a source relating the point to Bryan. . . dave souza, talk 20:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Antisemitism and Anti-Catholicism

edit

Per this article on the blog of the Oxford University Press, "William Jennings Bryan’s Bible-thumping fundamentalist presidential campaigns in 1896, 1900, and 1908 were tinged with loathing of Jews and Catholics". This should be explored with proper context. SecretName101 (talk) 21:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Obviously we'd need to find other corroborating sources to levy these characterizations. SecretName101 (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Other affiliations

edit

In the other political affiliations area of the infobox, it lists only populists. We should add Silver Yavneh (talk) 04:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply