Talk:Ukraine in the Eurovision Song Contest 2025

Ukraine in the Eurovision Song Contest 2025 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 8, 2026. (Reviewed version).

Song Contests Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Song Contests, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of song contest-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Song ContestsWikipedia:WikiProject Song ContestsTemplate:WikiProject Song ContestsSong Contests
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine Low‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA review

Latest comment: 2 months ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. Red Shell Momentum 03:01, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ukraine in the Eurovision Song Contest 2025/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 03:07, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: RedShellMomentum (talk · contribs) 19:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewing for WT:GARC#78. Red Shell Momentum 19:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@TheNuggeteer: Sorry for the delay. My comments are below. Red Shell Momentum 00:18, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@TheNuggeteer: Comments have been addressed, promoting (don't worry about the ref archiving, "the current estimated lag is 880 minute(s) and 37 second(s)"). Red Shell Momentum 03:00, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Comments

Duplicated refs:
- https://eurovision.ua/6922-suspilne-movlennya-pidtrymalo-zbir-gurtu-ziferblat-na-gumanitarne-rozminuvannya/ in refs: 28, 31
- https://eurovisionworld.com/eurovision/2025#ukraine in refs: 45, 55
- https://eurovision.tv/event/basel-2025/grand-final/jury in refs: 47, 54
Refs should be archived to prevent WP:LINKROT.
Minor concern with the source-spot check below.

Table

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	I've done some copy editing, so I believe this now passes.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Passes.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Passes.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Passes.
	2c. it contains no original research.	One minor concern with the source spot-check below.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Earwig shows 10.7% similarity, which is impressive, so this passes.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Passes.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Passes.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	I see 100% neutral wording, so this passes.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Page history shows ro recent edit wars, so this passes.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Images are tagged validly, so this passes.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Passes.
	7. Overall assessment.	Almost done, just a few concerns above.

Source spot-check

This table lists 2 random passages from throughout the article (4.3% of 47 total passages). These passages contain 2 inline citations (3.8% of 52 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. Red Shell Momentum 00:17, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reference #	Source	Notes
After winning Vidbir, Ziferblat decided to revamp the song once again for Eurovision. Adding orchestral parts in the chorus as well as a lightened chorus, Valeria Gazhala of Television News Service described the track better following the revamp.
31	eurovision.ua	Not seeing anywhere in the article that says this.
One of the backing singers was Khrystyna Starykova, a participant at the 2025 Vidbir national selection.
38	suspilne.media

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic