Talk:US–UK airstrikes on Yemen
| US–UK airstrikes on Yemen is indefinitely protected from editing as it is a page that can expect to need this level of protection on a multi-year time scale. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit extended-protected}} to notify an administrator, template editor or extended-confirmed editor to make the requested edit.
|
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the US–UK airstrikes on Yemen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to post-1978 Iranian politics. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Page history | ||||
| ||||
| The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Israel as supporter
editwould it make sense to include Israel in the supported by group. 2603:9001:7500:432:B486:37CD:756F:E987 (talk) 00:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Wrong article. See Red Sea crisis 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 15:14, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Houthi victory not American
edithttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/us/politics/trump-houthis-bombing.html
Don't see how this could be called an American victory. According to US officials the air campaign did limited damage, mostly killed civilians and failed to stop the Houthis targeting of Israeli ships and Israel itself.
Not to mention the US were the ones who rushed for a ceasefire because they'd lost so many drones and 3 fighter jets in the space of a couple months. Fakeloser (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- "Partial victory" is not a valid parameter in that type of infoboxes. I've changed it to "Inconclusive" 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 15:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
United States Marine Corps involvement
editAt this moment it only lists the US Navy, US Air Force and Royal Air Force as partipants, even though the USMC carried out its own air strikes on Houthi targets. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2025/09/04/marine-directed-strike-on-houthis-in-first-ever-f-35c-combat-mission/ F18Pilot (talk) 21:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)










