| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Privacy claims by label
editHello,LuniZunie, AntiDionysius, StartOkayStop, JeffSpaceman. I believe we are all aware of some editing disputes that took place on this page earlier today. I am currently busy but we need to reach consensus on keeping the anonymity of TUL8TE as the artist's label is attempting to keep TUL8TE anonymous. CharterDaGoob ✦ yer local goober ✦ yap? 16:31, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: seen your ping.I do believe the source can be considered reliable, but taking a deeper look I don't think we have enough sources to show this complies with WP:BLPPRIVACY, which is something I did not believe was true when I was checking on the surface level yesterday. – LuniZunie(talk) 16:34, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- Could you link the source again please?
- Thanks CharterDaGoob ✦ yer local goober ✦ yap? 16:38, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- No, I cannot. It would go against the reason for the removal. – LuniZunie(talk) 16:40, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- oh right true CharterDaGoob ✦ yer local goober ✦ yap? 16:41, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- So what I'm understanding is, if we find multiple reputable sources that state the same name, it would comply with WP:BLPPRIVACY? But until then just keep it as TUL8TE. CharterDaGoob ✦ yer local goober ✦ yap? 16:42, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yes.
Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public.
– LuniZunie(talk) 16:45, 13 April 2026 (UTC)- I agree. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:53, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yes.
- No, I cannot. It would go against the reason for the removal. – LuniZunie(talk) 16:40, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- I agree with the interpretation of BLP and that there aren't enough reliable sources to back up having the name included. Tarekmendelek (talk · contribs) should be made aware of WP:COI and that he should not edit the article anymore, or edit any connected articles; his behavior has been fine so far, and I think we've been able to reach a consensus, but I don't want this to pick up again and spiral out of control. StartOkayStop (talk) 17:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yea, this seems like a good resolution.
- So until we find more reliable sources stating his name, his name shouldn't be listed. CharterDaGoob ✦ yer local goober ✦ yap? 18:03, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Fixer88 This concerns you too as you added the text which was not in the Italian article. – LuniZunie(talk) 18:04, 13 April 2026 (UTC)