Talk:Trump v. Anderson
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2601:C2:1900:4EA0:BD62:6C91:2166:A5C4 in topic Fairness
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trump v. Anderson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Officer?
edit Does the ruling include whether the President is an officer of the United States? 207.96.32.81 (talk) 03:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- It would be OR to state that. I've read the decision and it seems absolutely clear they categorize the president as an officier of the US but that is a question in the presidential immunity case, not this one. Masem (t) 05:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Fairness
editThe fairness of this article is disputed, especially in reference to whether President Trump actually "incited" the riot when he did mention that supporters should "peacefully and patriotically" march to the Capitol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C2:1900:4EA0:BD62:6C91:2166:A5C4 (talk) 05:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)



