Talk:Tove Jansson Life, Art, Words/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 12:35, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 11:06, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, again. I'll review this tommorow. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 11:06, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	See below
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	No issues
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	No issues
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	See below
	2c. it contains no original research.	See below
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Nothing of interest
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Coverage is good
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Yes
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Yes
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Yes
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	File:Tove Jansson Life Art Words.jpg Fair Use Y File:Boel Westin 2014-09-29 001 (cropped).jpg fine, I think. the source link is dead, but was verified by a reviewer Y
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	fine
	7. Overall assessment.

1a

• "well supported by photographs and images of her artwork" - "well illustrated"?

  That would change the sense.

• "The reviewer in Svenska Dagbladet, however, felt" → "argued"

  Edited.

• "the scholar of literature Boel Westin" → "literary scholar Boel Westin" - less wordy

  BE uses "the", and again the meaning is not necessarily preserved.

• "Westin dedicated the book to Pietilä, and states that [...]" - tense inconsistency

  Fixed.

• "at once adding that [...]" - grammatical, but awkward, might be acceptable in BE

  Split sentence.

• "there was more to Jansson than just the Moomins" - "just" is superfluous

  Edited.

• "(sic, with just these two words in English)" - should use Template:Sic, the explanation is unusual

  Done, but the template on its own doesn't explain the special case.

• "it's" → "it is"

  Done.

2b

• All reliable, except for one which I'm unsure about. What makes Moomin a reliable source?

  Replaced.

2c

• Checking 40% of references.
• [5] check
• [6] check
• [7] check
• [8] check
• Note: [10] should have the same "in Swedish" tag

  added.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.