Talk:Tamagotchi Connection: Corner Shop 3/GA1
Latest comment: 6 days ago by Alexeyevitch in topic GA review
GA review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: IngeniousPachyderm (talk · contribs) 20:50, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 01:17, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- I'll review this article. Alexeyevitch(talk) 01:17, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Alexeyevitch Thank you for your review, please see my comments responses to your suggestions below.
- 1a.
The game released in Japan on September 27, 2007
→ The game was released in Japan on September 27, 2007- Done
The game received mixed reception
→ The game received mixed reviews- Done
mingame
- clearly a typo- Fixed
DS' microphone
→ DS's microphone- Done
brush the dust off by blowing into the DS' microphone to blow dust off
- seems repetitive- Agreed, cleaned up now.
shops will be four-stories high
→ shops are four-stories high- Done, also wikilinked to Storey.
After successfully serving a number of customers and receiving a sufficiently high rating
- wordy- Removed "a number of".
- Also, what is is the difference between 'multiplayer" and "true multiplayer"?
- Changed from "true" to "real-time multiplayer", as that is what the reference is referring to. Also added wikilink for Multiplayer.
get back on their feet
- informal wording.- Reworded.
towns
→ town's- Done
at an MSRP of $29.99
what's that?- Retail price in USA. I'll actually remove that and the other prices listed though because of (WP:NOTPRICE).
the games presentation
→ the game's presentationa total off 249,830
- typo- Fixed
- Also, I would recommend correcting the dates in the references to MDY instead of YDM (e.g. 2019-02-21 to February 21, 2019)
- Added the template and cleaned up references. Also added translated titles to non-English sources, and cleaned up some other sources.
- 1b.
costumes purchased for your partner Tamagotchi
, MOS:YOU says Avoid addressing the reader using you or your- Fixed
- MOS:NUMERAL says Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words.
- Fixed.
The game doesn't feature true multiplayer
→ The game does not feature true multiplayer (MOS:CONTRACTION)- Fixed
- § Plot is in accordance with MOS:VGPLOT
- 2b.
- the references are mostly reliable. I see that the "Cite Unseen" tool is flagging VideoGamer for being unreliable, but they are not used for any strong claims, so in this case I think they are fine.
- I was also curious about the VideoGamer source. It's listed as a Situational source according to the Video Games Wikiproject, but says it is considered generally reliable from 2004 to 2017. The article cited is from 2008, so I believe it is reliable.
- the references are mostly reliable. I see that the "Cite Unseen" tool is flagging VideoGamer for being unreliable, but they are not used for any strong claims, so in this case I think they are fine.
- 2c.
- [3] source link appears to be dead
- This URL has now been fixed
- [3] source link appears to be dead
- 4.
sold poorly
is quite strong wording, I would instead say had lower sales- Done
- 6b.
- Captions are mostly sufficient, although I think the later part of the caption
Mametchi wearing the Postal Worker costume [...]
is excessive- Shortened this caption now.
- Captions are mostly sufficient, although I think the later part of the caption
- Thank you very much for your review, and please let me know if you have any other suggestions. IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 17:31, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your responsiveness. Passing now. Alexeyevitch(talk) 23:25, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
| 1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
| 1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
| 2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
| 2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
| 2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
| 4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
| 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
| 6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
| 6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
| 7. Overall assessment. | ||
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.