Talk:Southern Arterial Route

Latest comment: 7 months ago by ChrysGalley in topic Comments left by AfC reviewers

Comments left by AfC reviewers

edit
  • Comment: Thank you to the submitting editor for the huge amount of work here. However there needs to be a few changes to get to acceptance. Almost all the sources count as primary sources, which are useful to the article and there's nothing wrong with that. However we can't derive notability under WP:GNG from primary sources. There are some secondary sources, such as Ozroads and SMH, but they look at small sections or aspects of the project. Inner Sydney Voice is probably not going to be regarded as independent as a source, though again for the article text that is OK.
    Can you find one or two more sources which are perhaps press reports, books, radio programmes, that look into the project as a whole, or have a broad sweep of coverage? I am hoping it won't be much additional work. By all means let me know if you find it, or if you prefer, discuss it in Teahouse.
    See also this essay WP:THREE to understand our difficulties here, and the slow progress of your article. I would not at this stage remove any source, but I will put a banner on, so that future editors can also help over time.
    Hopefully we can get this into mainspace in the near future. ChrysGalley (talk) 08:52, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply