Talk:Sources of the Danube
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 17 January 2026
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| On 17 January 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Source of the Danube to Sources of the Danube. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 17 January 2026
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:16, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
Source of the Danube → Sources of the Danube – Consistency with Sources of the Rhine and usage in the article itself. Srnec (talk) 20:57, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Support. The current title gives the impression that there is a single primary source of the Danube. Note that MOS:SINGULAR expresses an exception when a subject is a class that contains multiple things. The article says that it is common for some people to identify a single source for the Danube, but also that different people would identify a different source when doing so (e.g., the source of the Donaubach or the source of the Breg). This case seems more clear than the justification for title of Sources of the Rhine, since the article on that subject says there is one source that is generally credited as the source of the Rhine. — BarrelProof (talk) 21:22, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:42, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.