Talk:Solar dynasty
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Solar dynasty article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_name_of_the_God_as_per_the_Vedas.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
 | The content of Ikshwaku was merged into Solar dynasty on 2014-02-18. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Should Maharaja Agrasen be added as he was a Suryavanshi king from Kush's descendants?
editHe is pretty popular in india due to Agrawal community, I think he should be added here. What do people say? Ethicalweb (talk) 11:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
On neutrality and sources regarding religious connections
editHello all,
I recently added sourced information to the article to ensure that the connections of the Solar dynasty to Jainism, Hinduism, and Buddhism are represented in a neutral way. The article should reflect all significant Jain,Buddhism and Hinduism texts per WP:NPOV and WP:V.
At present, much of the content relies heavily on one perspective, while other traditions documented in reliable sources (including Jain and Buddhist associations) are underrepresented. My edits were aimed at balancing this and including properly cited material.
I have added my sources, and I welcome discussion if there are any concerns or suggestions. My request is that all contributions be verified against reliable references, so that the article does not reflect a single point of view.
Thank you. Shraman revival (talk) 07:01, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Can you provide a link to your source if it is available online? Otherwise, please mention the details of the source including publisher, relevant quotes and respective page numbers. Also, we need to know the academic qualifications of the author. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2025 (UTC)