Talk:Shorty Gallagher
Latest comment: 2 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Shorty Gallagher appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 March 2026 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
( )
- ... that there was a decades-long search for a photo of Shorty Gallagher (pictured)?
- Source: "... a 35-year journey culminated in this moment." Meisel, Zack (February 24, 2026). "A 30-year search for a long-lost baseball player comes to an unexpected end: 'I could finally exhale'". The New York Times. Retrieved February 24, 2026.
1brianm7 (talk) 04:38, 26 February 2026 (UTC).
5x expansion on 2/24 confirmed. Article is neutral and sourced. The third sentence in the lead does not appear elsewhere in the article and lacks sourcing - this needs to be fixed. Earwig check detected no issues: here. The hook is short enough, cited, and sufficiently intriguing. Photo is PD, low quality, but ties in with the hook and so is eligible for lead hook slot. Cbl62 (talk) 05:05, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Cbl62: I’m fairly certain that that sentence is true, but the source doesn’t exactly say so, so it’s been changed. I also took the opportunity to add another sentence. 6 minutes between a submission and review must be a record. Thanks! 1brianm7 (talk) 05:16, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the issue I raised. This is now good to go. And yes, I jumped on you submission quckly as I was intrigued (the sign of a good hook). Cbl62 (talk) 05:19, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Cbl62: I’m fairly certain that that sentence is true, but the source doesn’t exactly say so, so it’s been changed. I also took the opportunity to add another sentence. 6 minutes between a submission and review must be a record. Thanks! 1brianm7 (talk) 05:16, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

