Talk:Second impeachment of Sara Duterte
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Austin asis2011 in topic Committee votes with photos
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Second impeachment of Sara Duterte article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from (including jeepney and cyberlibel) other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When will we change the title?
editwhen will we change the name of this article to the the "2nd Impeachment of Sara Duterte"? (correct title) not "2026 Impeachment of Sara Duterte". Wilson Palacpac III (talk) 10:53, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Once the house votes to impeach Sara Duterte. She is technically not yet impeached even after the clarificatory hearing ended today. This should happen when the House transmits the article of impeachment to the Senate. It is in current awkward title right now cause Duterte was impeached last year but never removed from her role. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 12:18, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Once Duterte is indeed impeached, should we move Impeachment of Sara Duterte to 2025 impeachment of Sara Duterte, then this to 2026 impeachment of Sara Duterte? Howard the Duck (talk) 13:59, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- I think First impeachment of Sara Duterte and Second impeachment of Sara Duterte would be better. There's like a precedent for this (Like First impeachment of Donald Trump and Second impeachment of Donald Trump). Of course with the 2025 and 2026 links as plausible redirects. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah the Trump precedents look convincing enough. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:55, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- I think First impeachment of Sara Duterte and Second impeachment of Sara Duterte would be better. There's like a precedent for this (Like First impeachment of Donald Trump and Second impeachment of Donald Trump). Of course with the 2025 and 2026 links as plausible redirects. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Once Duterte is indeed impeached, should we move Impeachment of Sara Duterte to 2025 impeachment of Sara Duterte, then this to 2026 impeachment of Sara Duterte? Howard the Duck (talk) 13:59, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- okay be prepared my wikibros. They are gonna "most likely" impeach Duterte any second now. Wilson Palacpac III (talk) 02:16, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- 255 votes in favor. We can now change the title. LionFosset (talk) 09:18, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
RE: List of Solons' votes on the articles of impeachment
editHello wiki peps it would be great if we add a list of votes on the article. Though I already found a credible source for the solons' votes on the articles of impeachment, it is still under frequent updates and lacks a full list of all votes. You can access it on https://www.datawrapper.de/_/b7ytu/. Austin asis2011 (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
Committee votes with photos
editDo we really need a table that includes photos of the congressmen/women? Aren't we supposed to be sick of their faces (LOL). Howard the Duck (talk) 13:54, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- I think that we should be consistent on this article, let's just leave it as it is :>>. Austin asis2011 (talk) 15:44, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Consistent with what, exactly? Other impeachment articles don't present committee votes in this manner. Howard the Duck (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- I apologize if I did not explained it very clearly, what I meant on the term "consistent" was the fact that the first impeachment (article) actually has portraits of house members who signed the articles of impeachment. Austin asis2011 (talk) 17:24, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- It doesn't. Read again the article, then tell me whose portraits are there. Howard the Duck (talk) 18:11, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- I guess we can remove the portrait given that it would be a redundant because there are also portraits on the plenary vote. But the ones on the first article was the House members' signatories not the committee. Austin asis2011 (talk) 18:45, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- No, it wasn't the signatories, all 215 of them, either. There are only 13 portraits.
- Again, the committee vote is not presented in this manner, in any impeachment article, from any country. Howard the Duck (talk) 21:43, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- I guess we can remove the portrait given that it would be a redundant because there are also portraits on the plenary vote. But the ones on the first article was the House members' signatories not the committee. Austin asis2011 (talk) 18:45, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- It doesn't. Read again the article, then tell me whose portraits are there. Howard the Duck (talk) 18:11, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- I apologize if I did not explained it very clearly, what I meant on the term "consistent" was the fact that the first impeachment (article) actually has portraits of house members who signed the articles of impeachment. Austin asis2011 (talk) 17:24, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Consistent with what, exactly? Other impeachment articles don't present committee votes in this manner. Howard the Duck (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- It's been several days since the discussion and no one has given a good reason why this should still be on the article. I think iy wasn't really Austin asis2011 who added the information this way, since up to now, s/he still can't explain what the table actually is for. Howard the Duck (talk) 18:18, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi sorry I was busy with something. But to be clear I wasn't the one who added the table, it was there since then. I think I would be great if we just remove the table since the article already contains the specific information regarding the committee votes. Austin asis2011 (talk) 03:22, 14 May 2026 (UTC)