Talk:Postmodernism in political science
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
just because your writing is hard to understand
editdoesnt mean it has to be
Sources?
editHow can Frantz Fanon be considered a postmodern social scientist? The term postmodernism wasn't even coined at the time when he died (1961). Post-colonialism isn't the same thing as postmodernism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.114.124 (talk) 22:04, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Jargon
editThis article uses too much jargon and is too abstract to be readily understandable by general audiences (or at least by me). If you understand it, please improve it by defining the topic using common language and by adding understandable examples. --Lambiam 11:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Page is too narrow
editRight now, this is an article on postmodernism in international relations, which has its own page. See Postmodernism (international relations).
This article ignores strands of postmodernism in other sub-disciplines of political science, and that which crosses or disregards disciplinary borders. There are postmodern scholars of public law, American politics, Canadian politics, and so on. JapanOfGreenGables (talk) 00:24, 20 June 2025 (UTC)