Talk:Pope Pius XII

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Dimadick in topic Whitewashing Pius
Former featured articlePope Pius XII is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 3, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 27, 2006Good article nomineeListed
May 10, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
June 12, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
June 28, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
November 2, 2006Featured article reviewKept
August 23, 2016Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 2, 2011, March 2, 2013, and March 2, 2014.
Current status: Former featured article

Historical error

edit

"Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor on 30 January 1933 and sought to gain international respectability and to remove internal opposition by representatives of the church and the Catholic Centre Party. He sent his vice chancellor Franz von Papen, a Catholic nobleman, to Rome to offer negotiations about a Reichskonkordat. On behalf of Pacelli, Prelate Ludwig Kaas, the outgoing chairman of the Centre Party, negotiated first drafts of the terms with Papen. The concordat was finally signed, by Pacelli for the Vatican and von Papen for Germany, on 20 July and ratified on 10 September 1933. Bishop Preysing cautioned against compromise with the new regime, against those who saw the Nazi persecution of the church as an aberration that Hitler would correct."

is incorrect on several points. The Associated Press reported in 1933 that "Goebells a minister without portfolio" signed the concordant for Germany. Hitler was not in charge of German government and hadn't even picked his staff yet. President Paul Von Hindenburg was in charge and would only agree to appoint Hitler as Chancellor if Hitler accepted the appointment of Von Papen as Vice Chancellor according to the Associated Press. The Associated Press reported that in 1934 when President Paul Von Hindenburg fell ill and was thought to be on his deathbed, Hitler arrested former Chancellors von schleicher and von Papen among other opponents of the Nazi party. The Associated Press articles of 1934 reported Hitler had von schleicher executed and was preparing to have von Papen executed as well when the President Paul von Hindenburg recovered from his illness and pleaded with Hitler to spare the life of von Papen. In 1934, the Associated Press reported that Hitler spared von Papen's life but put him under house arrest. von Papen remained under house arrest for the duration of the war. von Papen was not acting under Hitler's orders when he approached the Vatican about signing a Concordant. He acted under the authority of President Paul von Hindenburg. As Chancellor, Hitler did not have the authority to negotiate with the Vatican. In 1933, that authority was still in von Hindenburg's jurisdiction. The Concordant was not an endorsement of von Hindenburg nor was it an endorsement of Adolf Hitler. Von Papen remained under house arrest and was not convicted for war crimes at the Nuremberg trials because he was Hitler's prisoner not a participant in the government.

An interesting side note: In 1933 the Associated Press reported when Hitler was appointed Chancellor by von Hindenburg Albert Eistein resigned his Prussian citizenship and was quoted as stating "the Catholic church was the only organization telling the truth about the Nazis." HistoryAndPoliticalAnalyst (talk) 02:43, 11 December 2022 (UTC)HistoryAndPoliticalAnalyst (talk contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Reply

The AP reported in 1933? Do you have copies of the reports, or full citations other than nebulous dates? Elizium23 (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
If you think that Hitler didn't take immediate and total charge of the German government in 1933, you're the one guilty of historical error JHobson3 (talk) 20:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

yes. 1934 not 1935. Sorry about the mix up. I was putting them all in order yesterday by date. Discovered my memory was off by a year.

<redacted copyright violations>  Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryAndPoliticalAnalyst (talkcontribs) 19:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC) HistoryAndPoliticalAnalyst (talk contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Reply
Look you need to stop with the WP:WALLOFTEXT. You are quoting far too much and we're going into copyright territory here. You are welcome to make specific improvements to the article or to suggest them, but you're playing around far too generally here and introducing wide swaths of facts that are strictly WP:UNDUE for a bio of this Pope. This pertains to one aspect of his reign, albeit major, but we need to keep it in perspective. Elizium23 (talk) 22:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
@HistoryAndPoliticalAnalyst, I've begun reverting your additions. Please do not add any more copyrighted material to this page. This is a talk page for discussion of article improvement, not a dumping ground for arbitrary data. Elizium23 (talk) 22:34, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
You're not getting it. You are not allowed to post copyrighted material anywhere on Wikipedia, except for short excerpts. Please see WP:Copyright violations and WP:NFCC, and stop posting copyright violations. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:43, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Copyright expired on these articles. I was providing excerpts for your convenience. HistoryAndPoliticalAnalyst (talk) 23:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Papacy Length error

edit

At the beginning of the article there is a sentence that claims his papacy was almost 90 years long. JTownshend (talk) 18:35, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

What you read was the result of this bit of idiocy. It was reverted after three minutes and the IP blocked. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

why was lead imaged changed

edit

why? ☦️ ~2025-31835-66 (talk) 04:03, 8 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reverted, since the original image was of a higher quality Obonyxiam (talk) 00:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Typo in name

edit

First line of chapter Papacy seems to contain a typo. It states the name as Pius XI instead of Pius XII. ~2026-10364-77 (talk) 12:10, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Whitewashing Pius

edit

The article would have you believe that Pius took a strong part in opposition to the Nazis and the Holocaust. This is flatly untrue. Yes, Pius did issue a strong condemnation of genocide. He issued June 1945, a month after the war in Europe ended. So, IN FACT, while the Holocaust was going on, Pius said NOTHING.

If you advertise yourself as a moral leader, then you had better show moral leadership. Pius chickened out. (If Pius didn't know about the Holocaust while it was going on, then every single papal diplomat in Europe should have been sacked for gross incompetence.)


JHobson3 (talk) 10:31, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have made several edits to begin addressing this point. Feel free to bring forward a specific source for consideration. A common criticism is that Pius XII managed to speak explicitly on the dangers of "Marxist socialism" but not the Nazi ideology through which Germany engaged in the extermination of Jews and others. I do not have an RS on hand to make this edit in a non-SYNTH way, but someone may wish to add. JArthur1984 (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
This is the wrong article to cover the topic. We already have Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust. One of the problems is that Pius XII received monetary rewards for his services to the Jews during World War II:
    • "On 21 September 1945, the general secretary of the World Jewish Council, Dr. Leon Kubowitzky, presented an amount of money to the pope, "in recognition of the work of the Holy See in rescuing Jews from Fascist and Nazi persecutions".[1] After the war, in the autumn of 1945, Harry Greenstein from Baltimore, a close friend of Chief Rabbi Herzog of Jerusalem, told Pius how grateful Jews were for all he had done for them. The pope replied, "My only regret is not to have been able to save a greater number of Jews."[2]" Dimadick (talk) 10:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
  1. McInerny (2001), p. 155.
  2. McInerny (2001), p. 152.