Talk:Oskil

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Mellk in topic Right name is Oskol

Should this be moved to Oskil?

edit

That's the Ukranian name of it after all. Neonchameleon (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 14 September 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 05:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


Oskil (river)Oskol (river) – I believe that the sources used say "Oskol" more than "Oskil". Thus, the article should be moved to Oskol (river). Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 19:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose all recent English sources that I'm seeing use Oskil, not Oskol. Results may change from country to country, but seaching Oskil river (without quotes) and clicking on the news section gives me 6,760 results; there's only 479 results if I do the same with Oskol river. Super Ψ Dro 19:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
I was talking about news. I don't think it's a requirement that they be sources like you described. Super Ψ Dro 08:43, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Right name is Oskol

edit

Oskil is distorted Ukrainian use of it. Oskol river runs both in Russia and Ukraine, in Russia there are towns Stary Oskol ("the Old Oskol") and Novy Oskol ("the New Oskol") on its banks, stary Oskol is a big city, 220thousands of population ~2025-40539-27 (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

There needs to be a move discussion first (see WP:PCM). Perhaps there is a common name argument to be made (see for example Ngram) since the last discussion was focused too much on recentism, but we cannot move it without discussion. Mellk (talk) 04:53, 15 December 2025 (UTC)Reply