Talk:One World Trade Center
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One World Trade Center article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives (index): 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| One World Trade Center has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Article missing a reference to the subsequent attack on the South Tower, 2 World Trade Center.
editOriginal text:
Together with a simultaneous attack on the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and a passenger revolt that resulted in a plane crash in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, the attacks resulted in the deaths of 2,996 people (2,507 civilians, 343 firefighters, 72 law enforcement officers, 55 military personnel, and the 19 hijackers).[38][39][40]
Suggested edit:
Together with the subsequent attack on the South Tower, 2 World Trade Center, a simultaneous attack on the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and a passenger revolt that resulted in a plane crash in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and the the attacks resulted in the deaths of 2,996 people (2,507 civilians, 343 firefighters, 72 law enforcement officers, 55 military personnel, and the 19 hijackers).[38][39][40] Bjs1595 (talk) 13:37, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Recent removal of content
edit@Sj, I noticed you recently removed a bunch of content from this page without an edit summary. First of all, it would be helpful if you can please use a edit summary, particularly for edits like this. It would help users decipher your intentions in removing the content.
That being said, I agree with some parts of the edit and disagree with others, so I'll describe my quibbles in more detail:
- The removal of the scaffolding incident - This is fine. It's arguably a minor incident that violates WP:NOTNEWS.
- "This led Advance Publications, parent company of Conde Nast, to start withholding rent payments in January 2021. By March 2021, Condé Nast had filed plans to reduce the amount of office space that it leased. After a prolonged impasse, Condé Nast agreed in late 2021 to pay almost $10 million in back rent." → " This led Advance Publications, parent company of Conde Nast, to start withholding rent payments and filing plans to reduce the amount of space that it leased" - I disagree with both the removal of the second source from each claim, and, to a lesser extent, the combination of these sentences.
- For the second source, the extra sources can be combined using a WP:CITEBUNDLE.
- As for the combination of the sentences, this eliminated some detail about what exactly happened, including the fact that the actual rent dispute was resolved. I'd say at a minimum that we should mention that these happened in early 2021
- "The PANYNJ has approved all the revisions." → "The PANYNJ approved all the revisions." - In isolation, this is inconsistent with the use of the present perfect in the preceding sentences. But I don't think the present perfect should be used anyway, so I've retained this change and also changed the rest of the paragraph.
– Epicgenius (talk) 13:30, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
- Yes I was removing trivia (the incident is mentioned at the end anyway). Thanks for the improvements re: the back rent, it looks good now. Cheers, – SJ + 19:52, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 May 2026
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "A seventh building was built in the mid-1980s." to "A seventh building was built in the mid-1980s." I'mfixinganerror (talk) 17:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
