Talk:Muktananda
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Muktananda article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rodarmor as the source
editWe need to be very careful with using Rodarmor as the only source of extraordinary claims. Firstly, such claims must be corroborated by other sources independent from Rodarmor. Secondly, Rodarmor himself is very careful and purposefully vague. For instance, he has has not written anywhere that Muktananda himself issued death threats. In absence of direct quoting, we should really avoid going beyond what's in the source. — kashmīrī TALK 07:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Tantra
editRegarding this revert, edit-summary
Your quote is from the thesis, in Caldwell's work she concludes he was not a practitioner. Page 25 from your source, "Despite their diversity, these accounts bear little resemblance to the ecstatic Kaula rituals described by Abhinavagupta in his Tantraloka, and lack their most essential component, a fully aware, consenting female partner or yogini. Whatever Baba was doing, claiming it to be a form of Tantric initiation, seemed rather to retain only the bodily shell of a Tantric practice"
which removed
Sarah Caldwell argued that Muktananda was both an enlightened spiritual teacher and a practitioner of Shakta Tantrism, but also "engaged in actions that were not ethical, legal or liberatory with many disciples."[1]
References
- ↑ Sarah Caldwell (2001). "The Heart of the Secret: A Personal and Scholarly Encounter with Shakta Tantrism in Siddha Yoga". Nova Religio. 5 (1): 9–51. doi:10.1525/nr.2001.5.1.9. JSTOR 10.1525/nr.2001.5.1.9. S2CID 143965805.
see the same page 25:
My thesis is that Baba was an initiated Kaula practitioner, that he aspired to model himself after Abhinavagupta, and that he revered the secret teachings of the Kula path as the innermost core of his power
Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 02:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- That's Caldwell's take. But his autobiography (on cursory glance) doesn't mention the existence of any Tantra or Kaula teacher. It;s no secret that Muktananda was self-taught on Tantra, and from Hindi books since his understanding of Sanskrit was quite poor. Even assuming that he secretly admired Abhinavagupta (obviously, without studying his Sanskrit works), can we blindly copy Caldwell's assertion on Kaula here? For once I agree with the IP editor to remove the passage. Muktananda's acts were not Tantric practices IMO; it was sexual molestation and rape, plain and simple. — kashmīrī TALK 02:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- We don't write about our opinions, we write about what WP:RS say. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- We need to assess the value of sources ourselves. And we can judge that Caldwell has no idea about Kaula. — kashmīrī TALK 09:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- We don't write about our opinions, we write about what WP:RS say. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Falsa information on Sexual Assaults
editIncorrect information about sexual assaults is posted in Baba Muktanand's wiki page. Kindly remove these false allegations ~2026-29199-93 (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
False sexual assualt section
editPlease remove the section below from Baba Muktanand's wiki page, as these are false allegations. Alleged sexual assaults Sarah Caldwell, in an essay in the academic journal Nova Religio (2001), argued that Muktananda was both an enlightened spiritual teacher and a practitioner of Shakta Tantrism, but also "engaged in actions that were not ethical, legal or liberatory with many disciples." According to Lola Williamson, "Muktananda stressed the value of celibacy for making progress on the spiritual path, but he almost certainly violated his own rules." Author Andrea Jain asserts "Muktananda engaged in secret sexual rituals with several of his young female disciples—some of whom were teenagers—that were meant to transmit sakti to the tantric hero." In 1981, Stan Trout, a swami for Siddha Yoga, wrote an open letter in which he referred to a number of stories of Muktananda engaging in sexual activities with young women, and threats and harassment in order to force people to "stop talking about your escapades with young girls in your bedroom." In 1983 William Rodarmor printed several allegations in CoEvolution Quarterly from anonymous female devotees that Muktananda regularly had sex with them and raped them. In the article, based on twenty five interviews, former devotees charged that Muktananda had molested under-age girls, and engaged in sexual interactions with young devotees, which "drew naive young women into esoteric Tantric rituals." Lis Harris repeated and extended Rodarmor's allegations in an article in The New Yorker (1994). ~2026-29199-93 (talk) 14:18, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for stating your personal view. The claims made are all public and all are reliably sourced per Wikipedia's policies. They cannot be tested in a court of law as Muktananda is no longer alive. Accordingly they should remain in the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

