Talk:Marek Ujlaky (footballer, born 1974)

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Alexeyevitch in topic GA review

"Marek Ujlaky (footballer, born 1989)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Marek Ujlaky (footballer, born 1989) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 26#Marek Ujlaky (footballer, born 1989) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Marek Ujlaky (footballer, born 1974)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Fcstmani (talk · contribs) 09:34, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 05:00, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm sorry to announce that I'm going to be quick failing this review. I see that very recently the nominator was blocked for copyright violations. Regardless of that block, I still unfortunately think the article is some ways away from GA status. The most concerning part of the article are the copyright statuses of the images. Here's my abbreviated review:

  1. , won the won the 2, this seems to be an error. other parts of this article seem to be too wordy. I think the phrasing is mostly OK after a short readthrough.
  2. , namely MOS:NUMERAL, MOS:FOREIGN, MOS:DATE
  3. , coverage is acceptable
  4. , the sources would need to be translated from Slovak to English, and investigated further
  5. , article is stable with no ongoing edit wars
  6. , there are issues with the copyright status of the images. they appear to be low-quality screenshots of presumably copyrighted material. I also note they were uploaded from a blank account.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.