| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Junkers Ju 252 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
editArticle reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 11:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Variants section
editDenniss I recently added a variants section to this article, in which I put the Ju 352 and Ju 452 as developments, which is in line with the manual of style for aircraft articles. Two hours later, Denniss reverted my edit without an explanation. Perhaps we should discuss this here to avoid any misunderstandings. - ZLEA T\C 02:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- 352 not a variant + also listed in infobox/See also section. Ju 452 was a paper project at best. --Denniss (talk) 12:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Denniss Many articles on WWII German aircraft, including Dornier Do 335, Messerschmitt Me 262, Messerschmitt Bf 109 variants, and Heinkel He 219, list developments, some of them paper projects, with the main variants. If not the 352, would you be opposed to listing the 452 in the variants section like so many other articles? - ZLEA T\C 13:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Paper projects, regardless of how far they got are deemed sufficiently notable for inclusion, and if there was more than one variant, there should be a variants section. As for the 352, developments are often included in variants, and that was what the 352 was. It would be remiss for either of these to not be included. - NiD.29 (talk) 23:14, 30 May 2020 (UTC)