Talk:Jordan Peterson
| Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jordan Peterson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Semi-protected edit request on 1 March 2026
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Jordan B. Peterson taught briefly at Point Loma Nazarene under the name Dr. Peterson, where he lectured Psychology 101 a few times per week to a small class of Freshman (less than 40 students). This was in the Spring of 2012. Msiebert2 (talk) 10:40, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:38, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Themes in books
edit@Officialsimontownsend your claim regarding the themes of Peterson's book is WP:OR. Please provide a reliable source for this rather than reverting back to a contested version with no justification. Simonm223 (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- I have no problem revising any of it, which part specifically is problematic? all of it is in the book itself. if you want to then rewrite that whole section, I don't care. Officialsimontownsend (talk) 16:14, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- The problem is that you detailing specific themes, cited just to the book, is WP:OR. What I want is for you to add a secondary source citation that actually supports these themes are in the book. Simonm223 (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- I just know this: he released the book forever ago and no one updated the wiki - so I did. fix it if it's wrong, I just wanted the ball rolling. I am not some expert Wikipedia editor. Officialsimontownsend (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- That's fine. Nobody is asking for perfection. But when I removed the material originally I left an edit summary asking for sources. You then went back and put back your edit without sources. The solution is simple: either remove that information or add the sources. The truth is that the slow rollout of information about the book on WP is largely because it had a very soft launch with only a small number of quite tepid reviews. The book was too atheist for the christians and too christian for everyone else. Simonm223 (talk) 16:33, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll remove it then, haven't seen any reviews, don't know what to reference. anyway, I am still happy you told me and for entertaining my thoughts, many thanks 🙏 Officialsimontownsend (talk) 16:58, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- That's fine. Nobody is asking for perfection. But when I removed the material originally I left an edit summary asking for sources. You then went back and put back your edit without sources. The solution is simple: either remove that information or add the sources. The truth is that the slow rollout of information about the book on WP is largely because it had a very soft launch with only a small number of quite tepid reviews. The book was too atheist for the christians and too christian for everyone else. Simonm223 (talk) 16:33, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Too many direct quotes
editIn many sections Peterson's direct words are used instead of paraphrasing, I understand this is done to maintain neutrality however it breaks the flow of the article. Is there a better way to achieve both goals? NotPixel (talk) 09:47, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- Can you give an example of a section you believe to be too dependent upon direct quotation? Simonm223 (talk) 11:01, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- ↑ Source: Melissa Siebert, student of Jordan B. Peterson






