Talk:Israeli–Palestinian peace process

Latest comment: 2 months ago by DiscoursesonLivvy in topic Small change to add the definition of the PLO acronym

Proposed new section on books

edit

Since there are a number of books on the subject for further reference, I would suggest adding the following section:

A Partial List of Books on the Israel-Palestine history and the Israel-Palestine peace process:

English

edit
  • Mark Tessler. A History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Indiana University Press, 2009, ISBN-13: 978-0253220707
  • William B. Quandt. The Peace Process: From Breakthrough to Breakdown. Brookings Institution Press, 2005, ISBN-13: 978-0520246317
  • Sami Adwan, Dan Bar-On, and Eyal Naveh (editors). Side by Side: Parallel Histories of Israel-Palestine. New Press, 2012, ISBN-13: 978-1595586834
  • Avi Shlaim. The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World. Norton, 2001, ISBN-13: 978-0393321128


  • Dennis Ross. Doomed to Succeed: The U.S.–Israel Relationship from Truman to Obama. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2015.
  • Benny Morris. Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881–1999. Knopf, 1999.
  • Nathan Thrall. The Only Language They Understand: Forcing Compromise in Israel and Palestine. Metropolitan Books, 2017.

Hebrew

edit
  • אפרים קארש. תהליך השלום: הניסיונות לכונן שלום בין ישראל לעולם הערבי (The Peace Process: Attempts to Establish Peace between Israel and the Arab World). Hebrew Edition.
  • תום שגב. מדינה בדרך (A State in the Making). Hebrew Edition.
  • אבי שליים. הקיר הברזל (The Iron Wall). Hebrew Edition.

Arabic

edit
  • رشيد الخالدي. تاريخ فلسطين الحديث: من العهد العثماني إلى القرن الحادي والعشرين (The Modern History of Palestine: From the Ottoman Period to the 21st Century). Arabic Edition.
  • أفي شليم. السلام المراوغ: إسرائيل والعرب (The Elusive Peace: Israel and the Arabs). Arabic Edition.
  • مهدي عبد الهادي. الصراع العربي الإسرائيلي: مئة سؤال وجواب (The Arab-Israeli Conflict: 100 Questions and Answers). Arabic Edition.
  • تشارلز دي سميث. فلسطين وإسرائيل: تاريخ مختصر للصراع (Palestine and Israel: A Short History of the Conflict). Arabic Edition.

Multilingual

edit
  • Jack Berriault et al. Israel and Palestine - A Common Historical Narrative. Multilingual Edition (English, Hebrew, Arabic). Israel Academic Press, 2020 ISBN-13: 978-1885881610

Contraverse (talk) 15:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Contraverse: Please add them at Bibliography of the Arab–Israeli conflict if they are not already there. Selfstudier (talk) 15:32, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Israeli–Palestinian conflict solutions" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

The redirect Israeli–Palestinian conflict solutions has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 31 § Israeli–Palestinian conflict solutions until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 11:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 August 2025

edit

Hey. I am trying to stay within the rules regarding discussing this subject, so I hope the following is an acceptable way to address an issue I noticed while reading the article.

In the paragraphs on

“Oslo (1993-2001)” within the section about the timeline, the following is written:

«Core to the Oslo Accords was the creation of the Palestinian Authority and the security cooperation it would enter into with the Israeli military authorities in what has been described as the "outsourcing" of the occupation to the PA.[5] »

Now the issue I have with this is the “described” part, which seems to be a MOS:WEASEL(attribution) issue to me.

To fix this, ideally specific names of people who have done this “describing” (along with sources for each) should replace the general language used.

Alternatively, or in the meantime, I’d like to suggest that: the template “[by whom?]” or another similar template, added after “described”.


I don’t dispute that people have made this description, and I also don’t mean to agree or disagree with it in this request.

Slomo666 (talk) 14:38, 6 August 2025 (UTC) Slomo666 (talk) 14:38, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I removed the disputed clause because it is redundant to the very next sentence, which is cited more appropriately to its source. --GHcool (talk) 17:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very much! Slomo666 (talk) 20:36, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Also to be clear I did NOT dispute the veracity of the claim that people have said this. Slomo666 (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

revert

edit

editoer reverted: "Chomsky is a well-respected political critic and clearly WP:DUE".

I'm sorry, the editor's personal opinion is irrelevant. This is WP:WEIGHT, Chomsky is a linguist. He is not a foreign and security relations scholar, he is not a statesman, diplomat or politician. Therefore, the editor's personal assessment of the writer (because of his linguistic talent or political views) is not a factor. He should have professional relevance. When it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, almost everyone (at least in relation to Israelis and I assume Palestinians as well) has an opinion.

שמי (2023) (talk) 16:39, 22 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

This isn't a case of opinion though, he is in fact a notable, widely cited author & respected political critic, having written several books on the matter. He was also properly attributed, so it's clear that it's his personal description on the topic.
Also for the future, if you want a response, I'd suggest pinging @EvansHallBear. Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Butterscotch Beluga, The fact that his critical political opinion is heard does not make him an expert in the field. After all, as I mentioned, he has no expertise in the issue and no involvement. There are many people with expertise (or involvement) with criticism of the Oslo Accords. Their positions are also more mainstream (it is difficult to say that libertarian socialism, Chomsky's worldview, is mainstream) and then it hurts WP:DUE. So why him? שמי (2023) (talk) 18:28, 22 August 2025 (UTC) Topic ban violation Jeppiz (talk) 18:53, 22 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps 'anti-Zionist' should be added as his bias is well known?Halbared (talk) 18:35, 22 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
DONE. --GHcool (talk) 19:04, 22 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Small change to add the definition of the PLO acronym

edit

Description of suggested change: There is no definition of the PLO acronym the first time that "PLO" appears in the article's text. The first instance of "PLO" should be changed to "Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)'s" with a link to the Palestine Liberation Organization page.


Diff:

PLO's
+
[[Palestine Liberation Organization]] (PLO)'s

Edsobcz (talk) 21:49, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done DiscoursesonLivvy (talk · contribs) 01:20, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply