Talk:Intisar A. Rabb

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:29, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Harvard professor Intisar A. Rabb was inspired by the Supreme Court of the United States to launch an online portal containing Sharia texts?

• Source: Garlock, Stephanie (April 15, 2015). "Harvard Islamic Legal Studies Program Launches SHARIASource Digital Platform". Harvard Magazine. Archived from the original on February 24, 2026. Retrieved February 24, 2026. Rabb sees even more of a model in SCOTUSblog, which offers commentary on the work of the U.S. Supreme Court. SHARIASource, she hopes, will similarly serve as a forum for interpretation and a space for scholars to make sense of the connections they find among its sources. ... Documents can be sorted by type—whether a primary source like a legal treatise or fatwa (an advisory opinion), or a secondary source like a book review.

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Flight Around Latvia, Template:Did you know nominations/Special Engineer Detachment
  • Comment: Potential Eid nomination - I don't think we have any Muslim women nominated right yet. Also, I have submitted a request for an image for the article.

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 757 past nominations.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC).

• I'll review this, though I may not be able to finish it until after I return from school. ミラP@Miraclepine 14:11, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited: - Trying to say SCOTUS on the basis of SCOTUSblog is more likely to invite doubts about verifiability, since editors may argue that the ref may have been referring to the mechanics of the site. So replace "the Supreme Court of the United States" with "law blog"/"SCOTUSblog" or something similar?
• Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Created yesterday and prose size 6079B. The Earwig matches above 5% are due to quotes, long proper nouns, or basic lists. Not much to say except a minor fix. I've proposed new hooks per above (I had to change "Harvard professor" to make it easier for editors to understand which Supreme Court without having to link or explain):

• ALT0b: ... that American academic Intisar A. Rabb was inspired by a Supreme Court blog to launch an online portal containing Sharia texts? Source: Same as ALT0
• ALT0c: ... that Harvard professor Intisar A. Rabb was inspired by SCOTUSblog to launch an online portal containing Sharia texts? Source: Same as ALT0
• ALT0d: ... that Harvard professor Intisar A. Rabb was inspired by a blog to launch an online portal containing Sharia texts? Source: Same as ALT0
• ALT0e: ... that Harvard professor Intisar A. Rabb was inspired by a law blog to launch an online portal containing Sharia texts? Source: Same as ALT0

@Crisco 1492: What do you think? ミラP@Miraclepine 21:19, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

• Hi ミラP, I was deliberately obscuring the blog for hookiness, but those work for me too. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

• Thank you! A promoter will decide which works, though I ranked them myself by DYKINT standards. ミラP@Miraclepine 23:07, 25 February 2026 (UTC)