Talk:High Bandwidth Memory

Good explanation

• c't vom 2015-05-16 pp. 140 introduces HBM very nicely. User:ScotXW^t@lk 13:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Insufficient Sources for AMD's involvement.

I recently went through the sources to see in what way AMD was involved with HBM, but there really isn't any mention of such. I will mark it as needing a citation until one is made. Furthermore, is the youtube video really an acceptable source?Sagacity159 (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Product firsts

(@ Ysangkok) There have been a few edits recently adding the first AMD or Nvidia HBM1 or HBM2 products, and I am glad to see the article is active and editors contributing. However, while not explicitly discussed here, it seemed from previous edits consensus was to list the first product released, by any manufacturer. Otherwise this ends up being a collection of trivia (the first Intel HBM product, the first XXX manufacturer's HBM product, etc). However, the first HBM1/2 products may be note-worthy within the manufacturer/product articles.

Does anyone else have any thoughts? I'd like to attempt to discuss this and find consensus before reverting other's edits. Dbsseven (talk) 19:44, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

There are not many HBM supporting products which have their own articles on Wikipedia yet. I don't think this article is bloated yet. I get the gist of your comment, but it is premature. This article has few edits per day, on average. --Ysangkok (talk) 11:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your statement about HBM supporting products not having articles is incorrect. All of the products noted already have articles, all of which explicitly highlight their use of HBM. (See the Volta (microarchitecture), Pascal (microarchitecture), Radeon Pro, Radeon Vega, and AMD Radeon RX 300 series articles.) Saying the article is short or infrequently edited is not really a justification for a unfocused and trivial additions. Regarding edit frequency, I would argue this exactly why we should discuss to keep the article clear and topical. See Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and Wikipedia:Too much detail. Dbsseven (talk) 14:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on High Bandwidth Memory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150206093927/http://isscc.org/doc/2014/2014_Trends.pdf to http://isscc.org/doc/2014/2014_Trends.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150424141343/http://www.setphaserstostun.org/hc26/HC26-11-day1-epub/HC26.11-3-Technology-epub/HC26.11.310-HBM-Bandwidth-Kim-Hynix-Hot%20Chips%20HBM%202014%20v7.pdf to http://www.setphaserstostun.org/hc26/HC26-11-day1-epub/HC26.11-3-Technology-epub/HC26.11.310-HBM-Bandwidth-Kim-Hynix-Hot%20Chips%20HBM%202014%20v7.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Present or past tense

A lot of the article describes the evolution in chronological order. Many sentences representing past events are written in present or future tense, suggesting it was not updated as later paragraphs were written. I will try to fix some of it by simply changing sentences about the the past to past or hypothetical sense according to context. These changes will not add or remove facts or sources, merely make grammar consistent with the fact that time is now Spring 2026. Jbohmdk (talk) 18:32, 4 May 2026 (UTC)