Improved refs

edit

@User:Kj cheetham Hello, I've added a few references. Please check if this is sufficient. All references have been checked and validated. Thanks. Johnwilliamsiii (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Johnwilliamsiii, I removed a little WP:Peacock and tagged one unsourced claim. Less is more; he is clearly notable but Wikipedia should always be neutral and reserved. I also think you use too many sources to back up some if the claims; please ask yourself "is this one really needed?". Clean it up then submit the draft. (Courtesy ping of Kj cheetham.) Ldm1954 (talk) 16:20, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ldm1954 Thanks for your help, the article has been accepted. I asked Theroadislong if the tag could be removed. His answer was: leave it for someone uninvolved to remove, if appropriate. Perhaps you are that person? Regards, Johnwilliamsiii (talk) 19:06, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ldm1954 Thanks again. I've learned a lot from you. Regards, Johnwilliamsiii (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply