Talk:Henry Kapteyn
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Henry Kapteyn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Improved refs
edit@User:Kj cheetham Hello, I've added a few references. Please check if this is sufficient. All references have been checked and validated. Thanks. Johnwilliamsiii (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- Johnwilliamsiii, I removed a little WP:Peacock and tagged one unsourced claim. Less is more; he is clearly notable but Wikipedia should always be neutral and reserved. I also think you use too many sources to back up some if the claims; please ask yourself "is this one really needed?". Clean it up then submit the draft. (Courtesy ping of Kj cheetham.) Ldm1954 (talk) 16:20, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ldm1954 Thanks for your help, the article has been accepted. I asked Theroadislong if the tag could be removed. His answer was: leave it for someone uninvolved to remove, if appropriate. Perhaps you are that person? Regards, Johnwilliamsiii (talk) 19:06, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ldm1954 Thanks again. I've learned a lot from you. Regards, Johnwilliamsiii (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ldm1954 Thanks for your help, the article has been accepted. I asked Theroadislong if the tag could be removed. His answer was: leave it for someone uninvolved to remove, if appropriate. Perhaps you are that person? Regards, Johnwilliamsiii (talk) 19:06, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

