Talk:Help

Latest comment: 27 days ago by Jacksonvil in topic Splitting proposal

Last Edit

edit

There was a recent probably malicious edit by Solidwings1256. Should be investigated by administrator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzomtceo (talkcontribs) 18:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Verification for Invention of "Concept of Help" Missing

edit

Hello I noticed a very specific date for the invention of the concept of help. The author of that section indicates it is April 3, 1564. Is it possible he meant April 1? :-) Reportica (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why is this so short?

edit

Why is this so short? Btw everyone should know what HELP means. Hellokitty1000 (talk) 04:37, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Article writing on medical treatment matter or article on any event

edit

Can any body send article for publication? If so what are the formalities to be observed? Shafiqur Mazumdar (talk) 13:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

possible semi- protection or pending edits

edit

I think this page should be semi-protected because as you may be able to see, this page seems to have been a target for vandals, as even recently, someone named "bwannan" made vandalism. Firestar9990 (talk) 20:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

why is there nothing under music

edit

there seems to be nothing under music. I do not know if I should remove it, but I would like to tell you. Firestar9990 (talk) 08:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Listed under songs.--Quisqualis (talk) 23:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
There are 12 entries in 3 subsections within Music. -- Fyrael (talk) 05:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Quisqualis: I mean in the section music in the page. if you look, there is nothing under the music tab Firestar9990 (talk) 06:35, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Again, there's 12 entries in Music. You're not making sense. -- Fyrael (talk) 04:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Help (Papa Roach song) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. RMCD bot 13:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

do you tell subject of article that you are writing about it

edit

i know there are always exceptions, but what is the default position? i am not a journalist, but i know that if i tell some that i am writing about zir, zie would act very differently, potentially in ways that are detrimental to the objectivity of the article  Preceding unsigned comment added by NerdestBruce (talkcontribs) 04:46, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

This talk page is about the word help. If you require help, refer to WP:Help desk (CC) Tbhotch 05:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
ok
do i just delete this thread from this page, or does someone or something do that later? i feel not great just removing it; it did happen NerdestBruce (talk) 05:08, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Talk page content is generally left for the archive. (CC) Tbhotch 05:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Trying to locate edit history

edit

I can’t find a link or button that reveals the edit history of an article. 2603:3014:C06:3C00:3C88:6560:F3A0:FFD4 (talk) 19:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Top right, it says "view history" LuniZunie(talk) 19:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Splitting proposal

edit

The section acrynoms should really be split into HELP. Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 00:33, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Makes sense, cf. same argument at Talk:Pe - two shorter lists should be better than one long one, provided they're cross-linked well to handle all-lowercase lookups intended for all-uppercase. --Joy (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I think this might result in readers being confused, I don't see how the extra disambig page would improve navigation. We could re-target the HELP redirect to the acronym section instead? ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 11:30, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Actually, I've done the retarget BOLDLY. ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 11:33, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
This works, but because of how our statistics work, we can't track clickstreams intended for HELP. --Joy (talk) 12:29, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ehh, I personally care less about the stats, as long as people can find what they're looking for (and since the other disambig entries are on the same page I think they'll find them) ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 12:36, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Well, it's a matter of how do we assess if we improve navigation. Sadly, there's little in the way of evidence either way. --Joy (talk) 12:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is a way, see pageview data Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 01:47, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
That shows the incoming views, but not the outgoing clicks based on each of those, cf. meta:Research:Wikipedia clickstream: Requests for pages that get redirected were mapped to the page they redirect to. (they're squashed together) --Joy (talk) 07:27, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I see. Then not much evidence. I guess the improvement to navigation is small. Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 06:29, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply