Flawed Hero is currently a Language and literature good article nominee. Nominated by TarnishedPathtalk at 23:12, 30 May 2026 (UTC) This article is ready to be reviewed in accordance with the good article criteria. Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review the article and decide if it should be listed as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the instructions. |
| This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (centre, colour, realise, program, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Flawed Hero appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 June 2026 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Text or other creative content from this version of Ben Roberts-Smith was copied or moved into Flawed Hero with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice start!
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 18:14, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
- ... that according to The Sydney Morning Herald, Flawed Hero: Truth, lies and war crimes "offers an important corrective – hero worship must not be blind"? Source: https://www.smh.com.au/culture/books/hero-worship-must-never-be-blind-the-lesson-from-chris-masters-20230731-p5dsnu.html
TarnishedPathtalk 10:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC).
- Comments by Tbhotch
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:

- Neutral:

- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:
- Cited:

- Interesting:

- Other problems:

| QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
A new article that is long enough. It is neutral, no copyvios per se, and the QPQ is done. The hook is interesting and sourced. The issue I find, however is that 1. {{no plot}}. The template is not physically there, but there is no plot. 2. The critical reception section is mostly composed of copyrighted quotations--more than the non-quoted text. This has to be reduced significatively. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 04:17, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch:, thanks for your review. I'll have a look at it, and the article, over the next few days. TarnishedPathtalk 10:35, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch:, I've added a synopsis section and summarised the longest quote. Please have a look. TarnishedPathtalk 09:35, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
The article was expanded. The article now has a summary, and the critical reception is no longer based on quotes. The additions are mentioned in the sources. GTG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbhotch (talk • contribs) 06:19, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Adding a procedural tick to ensure Tbhotch's approval moves this nom to the approved list. (Tbh, please be sure to sign your comments; an approval tick does not actually approve the hook unless the comment is signed, thanks!) Dclemens1971 (talk) 06:25, 19 May 2026 (UTC)





