Talk:Eldest Daughter

Eldest Daughter has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 18, 2026. (Reviewed version).

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 23 November 2025 by reviewer MCE89 (talk · contribs).

Taylor Swift Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chart positions

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added some chart position peaks, but I'm not totally certain if I did them correctly though and I wasn't able to figure out how to get the Icelandic chart to work. Feel free to edit/revert them. DavidL87 (talk) 03:44, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review

Latest comment: 4 months ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. Olliefant (she/her) 21:27, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Eldest Daughter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 16:30, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Ippantekina: Olliefant (she/her) 17:06, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Olliefant (talk · contribs) 04:59, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lead

Delink "Song" in the infobox

Not done it is automatically generated with {{Infobox song}}

[soft rock] [piano ballad] is an MOS:SOB violation

Done

Background and release

"digital-download" should be two words

Not done as a modifier to the noun "album edition" it is quite standard (at least in American English that I know of) to hyphenate the compound noun before it

What is a "Original Songwriting Voice Memo"?

Done

"with ~~the~~ American football player"

Not done the article follows advise at WP:FALSETITLE -- not saying that it is a strict MOS, but Taylor Swift is introduced as "the American singer-songwriter", and so should Travis be as "the American football player"

Music and lyrics

[soft rock] [piano ballad] is an MOS:SOB violation
"internet slangs", slang is uncountable so "slangs" is incorrect
"respectively from her albums, Lover and Folklore" -> ", from her albums Lover and Folklore respectively,"

Done all

Reception

"In The New Yorker, Amanda Petrusich and Tyler Foggatt" clarify that the two wrote different articles
"social-media" two words
Alot of outlet names are improperly listed, for example: "[Rolling Stone|Rolling Stone]'s" should be "Rolling Stone's

"

Done all

Credits and personnel

Link "Stockholm" on first mention
"Stockholm" -> "Stockholm, Sweden"
"Virginia Beach" -> "Virginia Beach, Virginia"
"[Sterling Sound], [Edgewater, New Jersey]" is an MOS:GEOLINK violation

I checked the MOS and it's correctly linked?
- Technically, I won't hold up the nomination over that

Charts

"PROMUSICAE" shouldn't be in all caps per MOS:ALLCAPS

That's an acronym and it's permitted per the MOS

It's not its a shortened version of Productores de Música de España

Oh ok, it is automatically generated by {{Single chart}} but I cannot edit it, so I left a message at its talk page asking for help. Ippantekina (talk) 21:21, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Certifications

Fine

References

Spot checks found nothing
Several refs are missing access dates
Ref 25 is missing the author
Ref 37 has an MOS:DASH violation
Why is "Atwood Magazine" a reliable source?

Per their About, Atwood is an independent music magazine with an editor-in-chef and editorial oversight. As it is not self-published (WP:SELFPUB), it is reliable. Ippantekina (talk) 15:19, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic