Talk:Dhumnath Temple
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Hilst in topic Did you know nomination
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Dhumnath Temple appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 January 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hilst talk 13:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the reliefs on the walls of the Dhumnath Temple depict erotic poses from the Kama Sutra?
- Source: Manwani, S N (1984). "The Kalachuri Temples - North of Mahanadi" (PDF). Temple Art of the Kalachuris of Ratanpur. p. 109.
temple walls are studded with erotic couples engaged in the act of sexual conjunction in various asanas (positions) and the sexual fore-play described in Kamasutra and other ancient Indian sastras
- ALT1: ... that one of the reliefs on the walls of the Dhumnath Temple depicts a man displaying his penis? Source: Manwani, S N (1984). "The Kalachuri Temples - North of Mahanadi" (PDF). Temple Art of the Kalachuris of Ratanpur. p. 110.
Next panel depicts an unusual erotic scene, the male exhibiting his erect organ with his feet raised up
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Yuri Kochiyama
- Comment: Will provide QPQ soon
- ALT1: ... that one of the reliefs on the walls of the Dhumnath Temple depicts a man displaying his penis? Source: Manwani, S N (1984). "The Kalachuri Temples - North of Mahanadi" (PDF). Temple Art of the Kalachuris of Ratanpur. p. 110.
AmateurHi$torian (talk) 21:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
AmateurHi$torian I assume good faith on the sources that I can't access. Both hooks are fine, but there is a category template that needs to be taken care of. SL93 (talk) 14:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SL93: Added 5 categories, and removed the category template. AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
This is now ready. SL93 (talk) 19:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
