Talk:Carl Linnaeus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Carl Linnaeus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Carl Linnaeus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 16, 2006	Good article reassessment	Delisted
September 27, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
August 15, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed
October 13, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
January 17, 2026	Good article reassessment	Kept
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 23, 2007, May 1, 2011, May 1, 2015, January 10, 2018, January 10, 2021, and January 10, 2026.
Current status: Good article

Biology Top‑importance

	Biology portal Carl Linnaeus is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animals High‑importance

Carl Linnaeus is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Biography: Science and Academia / Core

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is listed on the project's core biographies page.

Sweden High‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Top‑importance

	This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Science / Modern Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Philosophy of science
	Modern philosophy

Fungi Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecology High‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Tree of Life Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Caitlin Dewey (10 June 2014). "The most influential person on Wikipedia is someone you've probably never heard of". Washington Post. The most influential historical figure on Wikipedia, per a recent paper by researchers at several European universities, is none other than the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus — a.k.a., the guy who invented the system we use to classify plants and animals.

Section sizes

Section size for Carl Linnaeus (46 sections)
Section name	Byte count		Prose size (words)
Section name	Header	Total	Header	Total
(Top)	6,826	6,826	273	273
Early life	16	6,407	0	605
Childhood	2,692	2,692	291	291
Early education	3,699	3,699	314	314
University studies	24	4,483	0	543
Lund	1,278	1,278	130	130
Uppsala	3,181	3,181	413	413
Expedition to Lapland	4,626	4,626	501	501
Years in the Dutch Republic (1735–38)	800	12,507	76	1,232
Doctorate	3,827	3,827	381	381
Publishing of Systema Naturae	1,430	1,430	178	178
George Clifford, Philip Miller, and Johann Jacob Dillenius	6,450	6,450	597	597
Return to Sweden	2,626	18,406	249	1,619
Öland and Gotland	1,466	1,466	178	178
Västergötland	1,131	1,131	138	138
Scania	2,052	2,052	166	166
Rector of Uppsala University	1,055	1,055	127	127
Philosophia Botanica	362	362	43	43
Nutrix Noverca	2,198	2,198	172	172
Species Plantarum	2,350	2,350	93	93
Ennoblement	5,166	5,166	453	453
Final years	3,736	3,736	334	334
Apostles	1,728	4,694	184	552
Early expeditions	1,156	1,156	150	150
Cook expeditions and Japan	1,810	1,810	218	218
Major publications	61	3,893	0	340
Systema Naturae	1,893	1,893	178	178
Species Plantarum	522	1,939	34	162
Genera Plantarum	716	716	55	55
Philosophia Botanica	701	701	73	73
Collections	5,392	5,392	397	397
System of taxonomy	24	17,408	0	970
Linnaean system	3,166	3,166	303	303
Human taxonomy	14,218	14,218	667	667
Influences and economic beliefs	663	663	63	63
Commemoration	1,704	1,704	97	97
Commentary	3,802	3,802	136	136
Standard author abbreviation	60	60	0	0
Selected publications by Linnaeus	4,168	4,168	0	0
See also	196	196	0	0
References	16	10,351	0	0
Notes	50	50	0	0
Citations	30	30	0	0
Sources	10,255	10,255	0	0
Further reading	4,204	4,204	0	0
External links	4,606	4,606	0	0
Total	118,132	118,132	7,662	7,662

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 100 days are automatically archived 3 or more at a time by if there are more than 4.

Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2023

Latest comment: 6 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change formalise to formalize in the first paragraph. 2600:1700:2371:1C20:AD4F:B4B0:946A:9350 (talk) 23:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not done: The article is written in British English, which uses the spelling "formalise". ULPS (talk) 23:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oh no!

Yes, British English can use "formalise", but "formalize" is equally valid and has been preferred spelling of Oxford dictionaries since at least mid-1980s... :-)

—GRM (talk) 17:54, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Royal Society membership was not his only honour: he had been made a Golden Knight of the Pole Star in Sweden. See the title page of the 13th edition of Systema Naturae.

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Foiled circuitous wanderer (talk) 15:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Article review

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed the following:

There are uncited statements, including entire paragraphs and sections.
The "Commentary" section is overly reliant on block quotes, and should be written in summary style instead.

Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 16:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

Latest comment: 4 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Carl Linnaeus

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Issues appear to have been resolved. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:10, 17 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. The "Commentary" section is overly reliant on quotes and should be a summary of various sources instead. Z1720 (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

OK, I've tidied up the article, including paraphrasing in the Commentary section. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Keep. Concerns resolved. Z1720 (talk) 21:06, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

changing nowadays to modern day

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"He also corresponded with Giovanni Antonio Scopoli, "the Linnaeus of the Austrian Empire", who was a doctor and a botanist in Idrija, Duchy of Carniola (nowadays Slovenia)." using "nowadays" feels informal although i dont know if it would make sense to edit it to "modern day" to make it more formal FlintDoggo (talk) 19:17, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Citation for Linnaeus being the type specimen for Homo sapiens?

Latest comment: 25 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Intro para. This could use a citation. FWIW Smithsonian https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species/homo-sapiens has a page that states that there is no type specimen for Homo sapiens. ~2026-28455-54 (talk) 15:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Add topic