Talk:Brookfield Properties

Latest comment: 9 months ago by AlphaBetaGamma in topic Zuccotti Park

This is a doomed company...

edit

but it will be a long road ahead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.48.122.52 (talk) 23:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Updating this page

edit

I am a consultant that works with Brookfield Residential Properties. My goal is to factually update out of date company pages that were involved in the March 2011 transaction which formed Brookfield Residential Properties . See: http://www.brookfieldrp.com/content/2011_press_releases/brookfield_residential_and_brookfield_homes_report-26470.html

I am aware that I do have a conflict of interest. I'm here to contribute quality, neutral, verifiable information relating to the transaction and involved companies. My edits are not meant to be promotional in any way.

I am happy to discuss any concerns with my edits and offer suggestions for revisions if deemed innapropriate for Wikipedia, please contact me on my talk page. Mandatea (talk) 15:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brookfield Office Properties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

I work for Brookfield Asset Management in the Branding & Communications group, on behalf of Brookfield Properties. I'd like to suggest a series of edits for this page. I am committed to following Wikipedia's paid editing guidelines.

The first change I'd like made is to update the logo to the actual logo of the company, which I recently uploaded and can be found at the following URL on Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brookfield_Properties_logo.png. You will see this is the company's logo by looking at the company's website which is here: www.brookfieldproperties.com.

Thank you, Dvruthven (talk) 13:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reply 13-AUG-2019

edit

  Edit request implemented    Spintendo  18:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 19 August 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Newslinger talk 09:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


Brookfield Office PropertiesBrookfield Properties – I work in Branding & Communications at Brookfield Asset Management on behalf of Brookfield Properties. I am requesting that the name of this page be moved to "Brookfield Properties". Brookfield Properties has been the actual, functional name of the company since 2017. Please refer to the corporate website (www.brookfieldproperties.com) to confirm this is the self-declared name. In addition, "Brookfield Properties" is the name media outlets overwhelmingly and currently use to refer to the organization. As per a Google News search, "Brookfield Properties" yields 10,900 hits, while searching for "Brookfield Office Properties" yields only 2,330. Finally, please note that "Brookfield Office Properties" still exists as a legal entity for Preferred Stock Dividend reasons, but it has not been the functional name of the company for some time. Dvruthven (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Extensive edit request

edit

As disclosed above on this page, I work for Brookfield Asset Management in the Branding & Communications group, on behalf of Brookfield Properties.

I propose the following changes to the article, primarily with the goal of correcting, removing or updating inaccurate information, as well as adding new sourced content to the History section. I appreciate your patience in reviewing my proposed edits, as they are extensive.

Thank you, Dvruthven (talk) 13:38, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I've done most of the edits, but at discretion, I've kept some sourced information in the article even if it's slightly out of date. Thanks for your request! Sceptre (talk) 01:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Sceptre: Thank you so much! I noted that a few items were not addressed, so I wanted to confirm if they are able to be made. First, I requested removal of the "more citations needed" tag (see #1 in my edit request), since we've added a significant number of citations here. Second, I requested to change the first two sentences of the article (see #3 in my edit request), in particular to change "Brookfield Office Properties Inc." to "Brookfield Properties" and "North American commercial real estate company" to "global real estate services and development company." Finally, I had requested changes to the paragraph about the events of 2005-2006 (see #11 in my edit request). It looks like the sentence on 2006 was inadvertently duplicated and the changes to the sentence on 2005 didn't make it in.
I very much appreciate your time on this as I know there were a significant amount of changes. Thanks again for all your help! Dvruthven (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Dvruthven: Hello! Thanks for alerting me of the few things I've missed. I've done the first and last things you've asked for; with regards to changing "North American" to "global", I think the practice is to use countries (or sometimes for cross-border companies regional) as a demonym, even if they're global companies (compare: Viacom (2005–present), Nestlé). I'm not overly fussed over whether it says "Canadian", "North American", or "global", though; I'm just following what seems to be best practice. Sceptre (talk) 22:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Sceptre: Thank you again! Dvruthven (talk) 12:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

As disclosed previously, I work for Brookfield Asset Management in the Branding & Communications group, on behalf of Brookfield Properties.

I would like to propose that the page "Brookfield Properties Retail Group" be merged into the "Brookfield Properties" page. I am suggesting this merger as there is technically no entity with the name "Brookfield Properties Retail Group." It does not exist as its own company, but rather is the operational group of Brookfield Properties that manages the company's retail real estate portfolio.

If you visit the website for our retail portfolio, you will see that it only refers to Brookfield Properties and not to Brookfield Properties Retail Group.

Thank you in advance for your consideration. Dvruthven (talk) 13:57, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, @TonyTheTiger and Dmehus: Some time has passed, and there does not appear to be any opposition to my proposal to merge Brookfield Properties Retail Group into Brookfield Properties. I would be inclined to perform the merger myself, but I am avoiding editing these pages due to my disclosed conflict of interest. Can one of you please do the honors?

Doug, regarding your proposed second-step merger, I think the best course of action would be to first take care of the uncontroversial merger of Brookfield Properties Retail Group, and then you can propose the second merger separately at Talk:Brookfield Property Partners, where I will chime in. Thanks! Dvruthven (talk) 19:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Edit request: Merging Brookfield Properties Retail Group into Brookfield Properties

edit

As disclosed above, I work for Brookfield Asset Management in the Branding & Communications group, on behalf of Brookfield Properties.

In the previous section of this Talk page, I proposed the merger of Brookfield Properties Retail Group into Brookfield Properties, since, as I wrote, Brookfield Properties Retail Group "does not exist as its own company, but rather is the operational group of Brookfield Properties that manages the company's retail real estate portfolio." This can be corroborated by retail group's website, which refers only to Brookfield Properties and not to "Brookfield Properties Retail Group."

The merger proposal attracted some support and no opposition, so I am requesting that the merger be implemented, as I am avoiding editing these pages due to my disclosed conflict of interest.

I am requesting that the relevant content from Brookfield Properties Retail Group, specifically the history of GGP, be added to the History section of Brookfield Properties in the manner described in the collapsed section below, and that Brookfield Properties Retail Group redirect to Brookfield Properties.

Thank you, Dvruthven (talk) 20:44, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reply 30-OCT-2019

edit

  Wrong venue. Please use WP:MERGEREQ  

  • Please note that any requested merger involving a conflict of interest is automatically assumed to be controversial in nature; thus, an uncontroversial merger as described by the COI editor would not be possible.
  • The previous forum used was WP:AFD. In order to complete this "first stage merger" — which is merging selective material from this article into another — the request should be submitted via selective merge requests. That is the appropriate forum for implementing this request.
  • More information and assistance may be found at WP:PROPMERGE.

Regards,  Spintendo  23:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Edit request: regarding recent addition of "subsidiary"

edit

I work for Brookfield Asset Management in the Branding & Communications group, on behalf of Brookfield Properties.

Recently, an editor added Center Parcs UK as a subsidiary of Brookfield Properties. This is incorrect; it is owned by Brookfield Property Partners, not Brookfield Properties (source). Please revert this change.

Separately, in the edit prior to the most recent one, someone added a question mark following the "Net income" number in the infobox. Please remove that as well.

Thank you! Dvruthven (talk) 13:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Reply 21-FEB-2020

edit

❎  Items removed  

  • The two previous edits to the article have been removed as requested.

Regards,  Spintendo  14:20, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020 layoffs

edit

I work for Brookfield Asset Management in the Branding & Communications group, on behalf of Brookfield Properties.

User:Pmaccabe recently added a section called "2020s" with the sentence: "In September 2020 the company announced a layoff of 20% of employee's, around 200 people." For accuracy's sake, please change "the company" to "the company's retail group." This is an important distinction because the retail group is only one of several sectors of Brookfield Properties, and the current language incorrectly suggests that the layoffs will affect 20% of the entire company's employees, rather than 20% of Brookfield Properties' retail group alone. Thank you! Dvruthven (talk) 12:24, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

 Done --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Lead section

edit

Hello, I work for Brookfield Properties and would like to propose the restoration (potentially in revised form) of two lines that were removed from the lead about two months ago.

The first line that was removed on the basis of WP:NOTADIRECTORY noted that the company's real estate portfolio "includes facilities in the office, multifamily residential, retail, hospitality, and logistics industries." Far from being a trivial list of assets, though, these are basic categories of commercial real estate (see Commercial property#Types of commercial property). It's important to mention these categories in the lead so readers can understand, on a very basic level, what types of real estate Brookfield Properties manages.

In addition, a list of the company's locations was also removed in the same edit: "Brookfield Properties operates corporate offices in New York City, Toronto, London, Sydney, and São Paulo." I agree that this sentence was unwieldy and went into unnecessary detail for the lead - and would be even worse now, since the company now has offices in nine countries, not five. I would instead propose including a version of that sentence without the list - something like: "As of 2024, Brookfield Properties operates corporate offices in nine countries around the world.[1]

Graywalls, what do you think?

References

Thank you, Claudiailagan (talk) 13:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have added back the categories of real estate to the lead, as I do not think this violates WP:NOTDIR. The previous edit over-simplified the lead, since (for example) the commercial real estate and residential real estate are distinct sectors of the real-estate industry, and it doesn't really help to remove this detail.
I will leave the second part of this edit request for later (or for someone else to address). On my talk page, I asked Claudiailagan to provide secondary sources for the list of the company's locations. Here are the sources that Claudiailagan provided:
Epicgenius (talk) 15:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
(I must add that the source for China is not a reliable source, per WP:GLOBALTIMES. I haven't checked the other sources yet.) Epicgenius (talk) 15:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for implementing the first part of the edit, Epicgenius. In response to your diligence, here are some better sources to support that Brookfield Properties operates in China: , . I apologize that my original source was unreliable. I hope this will help you to finish working on the request. Thank you, Claudiailagan (talk) 18:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the response, @Claudiailagan. Although the Variety source seems reliable, I think it may be better for you to make a formal edit request for the second half of your edit, since I am unfamiliar with the other sources you listed. Epicgenius (talk) 18:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Epicgenius, I took your advice and am opening a new edit request. I appreciate your input. Claudiailagan (talk) 21:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Updates to Brookfield Properties locations

edit

As per the request in the above conversation, I am posting a new edit request to address the issue of the company’s locations that were deleted from the lead a few months ago. Since the company has now added additional international offices, and it would be too long to list all 9 locations, I propose that the following sentence be added to the lead:

  • As of 2024, Brookfield Properties operates corporate offices in nine countries around the world.[1].

In addition to the above primary source and the sources for the 4 locations (Canada, the UK, Australia, and the US) that are already included on the page, here are sources for the 5 remaining locations:

I hope you will consider adding the sentence to the lead. Thank you. Claudiailagan (talk) 21:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have since done some additional research, and I have found some more prominent secondary sources to back up the primary (WP:ABOUTSELF) information at the Brookfield Properties contact page:
Pinging Epicgenius, per our discussion at his user talk page. Thank you, Claudiailagan (talk) 14:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

Claudiailagan (talk) 21:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done ⸺(Random)staplers 17:49, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your help, Randomstaplers. Claudiailagan (talk) 13:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Zuccotti Park

edit

Hi there, I noticed the Zuccotti Park section of the article, which seems very out of place. I'd like to suggest that it be removed. At this point the information is outdated and irrelevant both to the big picture and to Brookfield Properties specifically. The information is also already included at Zuccotti Park, as is appropriate. Thank you! Claudiailagan (talk) 18:30, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 13:34, 20 August 2025 (UTC)Reply